...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental engineering and management journal >OPTIMAL DESIGN OF CASCADE SPILLWAY USING META-HEURISTIC ALGORITHMS: COMPARISON OF FOUR DIFFERENT ALGORITHMS
【24h】

OPTIMAL DESIGN OF CASCADE SPILLWAY USING META-HEURISTIC ALGORITHMS: COMPARISON OF FOUR DIFFERENT ALGORITHMS

机译:荟萃启发式算法的级联溢洪道最优设计:四种不同算法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In the present research, four meta-heuristic algorithms named Genetic Algorithm (GA), Gravitational Search Algorithm (GSA), Particle Swann Optimization (PSO), and Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) have been used for optimal design of cascade spillway to minimize the construction cost. Usually, the traditional design methods such as Vittal and Porey (VP) method or experimental modeling are used to solve this problem leading to infeasible or near optimal solution. The main novelty of this paper is to use effective methods to solve this complex highly constrained problem. Therefore, due to unique features of meta-heuristic algorithms, these algorithms are used here to minimize the construction cost of cascade spillway as the energy dissipater structure. As the case study, cascade spillway of Tehri dam in India had been chosen. The algorithms results have been compared together and with the VP results. Comparison of the results show the effectiveness and affectivity of these algorithms to solve this optimization problem. In other words, when three-stepped spillway are considered, the results are improved with 16.16%, 16.4%, 17.73% and 17.63% respectively using GA, GSA, PSO and ABC algorithms and in the same manner, for four-stepped spillway, the results are improved 14.5%, 16.1%, 16.45% and 16.05% respectively using GA, GSA, PSO and ABC algorithms in comparison with the VP results.
机译:在本研究中,四种名为遗传算法(GA),重力搜索算法(GSA),粒子威胁优化(PSO)和人造蜂菌落(ABC)的四个元启发式算法已被用于级联溢洪道的最佳设计,以最小化施工成本。通常,诸如Vittal和Porey(VP)方法或实验建模等传统设计方法用于解决这一问题,导致不可行或接近最佳解决方案。本文的主要新颖性是利用有效方法来解决这一复杂的高度约束问题。因此,由于元启发式算法的独特特征,这里使用这些算法以最小化级联溢洪道作为能量消散结构的结构成本。如案例研究,选择了印度的Tehri大坝的级联溢洪道。算法结果已经在一起和VP结果进行了比较。结果的比较显示了这些算法解决了这种优化问题的有效性和情感。换句话说,当考虑三步溢洪道时,使用GA,GSA,PSO和ABC算法分别提高了16.16%,16.4%,17.73%和17.63%,以相同的四个阶梯溢洪道,与VP结果相比,结果分别提高了14.5%,16.1%,16.45%和16.05%,分别使用GA,GSA,PSO和ABC算法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号