首页> 外文期刊>Environmental & Resource Economics >Social Versus Private Benefits of Energy Efficiency Under Time-of-Use and Increasing Block Pricing
【24h】

Social Versus Private Benefits of Energy Efficiency Under Time-of-Use and Increasing Block Pricing

机译:社会与能源效率的社会与私人效益在使用时段和增加的块定价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Many energy policies are implemented to subsidize the adoption of energy efficiency. However, when private benefits from energy efficiency exceed the social benefits, there is an incentive for the consumers to over-invest in energy efficiency; otherwise, there is an incentive to under-invest. This study adds to this discussion by providing an empirical estimation of the electricity savings and social benefits after energy efficiency retrofits for consumers on time-of-use (TOU) and increasing block pricing, respectively. We aim to examine how social versus private savings from a given energy efficiency measure may be different depending on different pricing plans. This study applies hourly electricity data for about 16,000 residential consumers during 2013-2017 in Arizona. We show that for the TOU consumers, the private savings from energy-efficient AC retrofits are greater than the social savings by 61%, while the increasing block rate consumers' private savings exceed the social savings by 46%, when other market failures are not considered (e.g., principal-agent problem and imperfect information). Different rate plans impose different marginal electricity prices which influence the incentives to invest in energy efficiency as well as electricity consumption behaviors that can influence both the private and social savings from energy efficiency. The result indicates that there should be potentially different levels of policy interventions towards energy efficiency for consumers on different pricing. Additionally, we also find that energy efficiency makes the electricity demand more elastic to price changes.
机译:实施了许多能源政策以补贴采用能源效率。但是,当能源效率的私人受益超过社会福利时,消费者对消费者提供了过度投资能效的激励;否则,投入投资的激励。本研究通过在使用时间(TOU)和增加块定价后,通过提供能源效率改造后的电力节省和社会效益的实证估计来增加本讨论。我们的目标是探查如何根据不同的定价计划的给定能效措施的社交与私人节省。本研究在亚利桑那州的2013-2017期间适用于大约16,000个住宅消费者的每小时电力数据。我们表明,对于Tou消费者,节能的交流改造的私人节约大于社会节省61%,而当其他市场失败不是,储蓄率的私人储蓄越来越低于社会储蓄超过社会节省。考虑(例如,委托 - 代理问题和不完美的信息)。不同的利率计划征收不同的边际电价,影响激励能源效率以及能够影响能源效率的私人和社会节省的电力消耗行为。结果表明,对不同定价的消费者的能源效率应该有可能不同的政策干预措施。此外,我们还发现能效使电力需求更加弹性才能进行价格变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号