首页> 外文期刊>Environmental & Resource Economics >Agri-environmental Policies and Public Goods: An Assessment of Coalition Incentives and Minimum Participation Rules
【24h】

Agri-environmental Policies and Public Goods: An Assessment of Coalition Incentives and Minimum Participation Rules

机译:农业环境政策和公共产品:对联盟激励的评估和最低参与规则

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

An increasing number of papers analyse the inclusion of collective/spatial conditionality constraints in agricultural policies dealing with natural resource management. In this article we theoretically assess the conditions in which employing collective conditionality constraints linked to incentives better reach the social preferences on PG provision by agriculture. We deal with this issue by using a coalition formation model to endogenize the size of the group of farmers cooperating, and investigate how it is affected by different policy schemes. We analyse and compare the following policy schemes: (1) a homogenous payment that target the whole population of farmers, (2) a coalition bonus, that incentivizes only the contributions by the coalition members, and (3) a coalition bonus associated to a MPR on the size of the coalition. The results show that formulating payments that discriminate between co-operators and free-riders, and associating to such a payment a MPR, is relatively more effective than the traditional homogenous payments. However this is true only under some (local) conditions that we theoretically derived.
机译:越来越多的论文分析了在处理自然资源管理的农业政策中纳入集体/空间条件限制。在本文中,我们理论评估雇用与激励措施相关的集体条件限制的条件更好地达到农业PG提供的社会偏好。我们通过使用联盟形成模型来以内生成农民组合的规模来处理这个问题,并调查它如何受到不同政策计划的影响。我们分析和比较以下策略计划:(1)针对整个农民人口的同质支付,(2)联盟奖金,只能促进联盟成员的捐款,以及(3)与A相关联的联盟奖金MPR在联盟的规模上。结果表明,制定歧视共同运营商和搭便车的支付,以及与MPR相关联的支付,比传统的同质支付相对更有效。然而,这仅是我们理论派生的一些(本地)条件下的真实。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号