首页> 外文期刊>European Environment & Packaging Law >Ecj Rules Steelmakers' Inclusion In Ets Is Justified
【24h】

Ecj Rules Steelmakers' Inclusion In Ets Is Justified

机译:Ecj裁定钢铁制造商将其纳入Ets是合理的

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Steelmakers are not discriminated against by the EU Emissions's Trading Scheme (ETS), the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has ruled. The ECJ said last month that the case filed by Arcelor Atlantique and Lorraine in 2005, which alleged the industry was being singled out because other sectors such as "the aluminium and plastic industries' were not included in the ETS, was not admissible. "The difference in treatment caused by the exclusion of the chemical and non-ferrous metal sectors from the scope of the directive [the ETS] may be regarded as justified," the EU court ruled on 16 December. Under the ETS, which forms the backbone of the EU's drive to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, facilities are given, or have to bid for, credits which entitle them to a certain amount of carbon emissions. If they exceed their limits, they have to buy or trade for more credits.
机译:欧洲法院(ECJ)裁定,钢铁生产商不受欧盟排放交易计划(ETS)的歧视。 ECJ上个月表示,Arcelor Atlantique和Lorraine在2005年提起的诉讼不予受理,该诉讼称该行业被选出是因为其他行业,例如“ ETS中未包括铝和塑料行业”。由于将化学和有色金属行业排除在指令范围之外而造成的待遇差异可能被认为是合理的,”欧盟法院于12月16日裁定。欧盟为减少温室气体排放而采取的行动,是给予了信用额度,或者是要竞标设施,以使它们有权获得一定量的碳排放量;如果碳信用额度超过其限额,则必须购买或交易以获取更多的信用额度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号