首页> 外文期刊>Environment reporter >Epa/doj Interim Enforcement Discretion Policy Concerning 'windfall Liens' Under Section 107(r) Of Cercla
【24h】

Epa/doj Interim Enforcement Discretion Policy Concerning 'windfall Liens' Under Section 107(r) Of Cercla

机译:有关Cercla第107(r)条中“意外收获留置权”的Epa / doj临时执法自由裁量权政策

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This memorandum discusses the United States Environmental Protection Agency's ("EPA" or "Agency") and the Department of Justice's ("DOJ") implementation of new Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act ("CERCLA") Section 107(r), the "windfall lien" provision of the Small Business Lia bility Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act ("Brownfields Amendments"), P.L. 107-118. This interim policy describes how EPA and DOJ will generally exercise their enforcement discretion in the context of the new CERCLA §107(r) windfall lien provision. However, because each situation will be fact-specific, EPA does not intend to restrict Regional discretion to make case-specific determinations at variance with EPA's general approach described herein.rnThis interim policy memorandum does three things;rn1. Eirst, it articulates factors that may lead EPA and DOJ to assert a windfall lien and provides examples of situations where EPA will generally not pursue a windfall lien.rn2. Second, this memorandum describes EPA's and DOJ's approach to settling windfall liens. EPA will generally seek only the increase in fair market value attributable to EPA's response action that occurs after a bona fide prospective purchaser acquires a property. In addition, this memorandum discusses how the Agency will generally address situations where a bona fide prospective purchaser acquires a property with an existing CERCLA §107(1) lien.
机译:本备忘录讨论了美国环境保护局(EPA)或司法部(DOJ)对新的《综合环境响应,赔偿和责任法》(CERCLA)第107(r)条的实施,《小企业责任救济和布朗菲尔德复兴法案》(“布朗菲尔德修正案”)的“意外收益留置权”条款, 107-118。该临时政策描述了EPA和DOJ在新的CERCLA§107(r)意外收获留置权规定的范围内通常如何行使执法自由裁量权。但是,由于每种情况都是特定于事实的,因此EPA并不打算限制地区的酌处权,以便与本文所述的EPA一般方法有所不同。rn此临时政策备忘录做了三件事:rn1。首先,它阐明了可能导致EPA和DOJ主张意外收获留置权的因素,并举例说明了EPA通常不会追求意外留置权的情况。其次,本备忘录描述了EPA和DOJ的解决横财留置权的方法。 EPA通常只会寻求由于善意的潜在购买者在购买物业后发生的EPA响应行动而导致的公平市场价值增加。此外,本备忘录还讨论了原子能机构通常如何处理善意的潜在购买者以CERCLA§107(1)留置权获得财产的情况。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environment reporter》 |2008年第44期|632-642|共11页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号