首页> 外文期刊>Environment reporter >Mexichem Specialty Resins, Inc. v. EPA
【24h】

Mexichem Specialty Resins, Inc. v. EPA

机译:Mexichem Specialty Resins,Inc.诉EPA

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Manufacturers of polyvinyl chloride may not bring certain claims under Clean Air Act challenging rule issued by Environmental Protection Agency limiting hazardous air pollutant emissions from PVC production alleging that EPA provided inadequate notice and comment period, final rule was not logical outgrowth of proposed rule, PVC-combined process vent emission limits are unreasonable, and limits in process wastewater were based on incomplete or incorrect data, because: (1) claims were not raised during notice and comment period but during unresolved petition for reconsideration, (2) EPA has not functionally denied re- consideration or finished reconsideration while refusing to acknowledge it did so, and (3) EPA has not engaged in unreasonable delay in addressing reconsideration petition.
机译:聚氯乙烯的制造商可能不会根据环境保护署发布的《清洁空气法》具有挑战性的规则提出某些要求,该规则限制了PVC生产中的有害空气污染物排放,声称EPA未提供足够的通知和意见征询期,最终规则并非拟议规则的逻辑产物,PVC-合并的过程排气口排放限制不合理,并且过程废水的限制基于不完整或不正确的数据,原因是:(1)在通知和评论期间未提出索赔,但在未解决的复议请愿期间(2)EPA未在功能上予以拒绝重新考虑或完成重新审议,但拒绝承认这样做,并且(3)EPA在处理重新审议请愿书方面没有进行不合理的拖延。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environment reporter》 |2015年第13期|1541-1555|共15页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号