...
首页> 外文期刊>Environment reporter >CERCLA Allocation Within Court's Discretion; Ruling Rejects Formulas, Widens Circuit Split
【24h】

CERCLA Allocation Within Court's Discretion; Ruling Rejects Formulas, Widens Circuit Split

机译:CERCLA在法院自由裁量权内的分配;裁决拒绝公式,扩大电路分裂

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Superfund law doesn't require federal trial courts to employ a specific formula in allocating costs between private parties, a federal appeals court unanimously ruled April 2, widening a split among the circuits (AmeriPride Serv., Inc. v. Tex. E. Overseas, Inc., 2015 BL 94095, 9th Cir., No. 12-17245, 4/2/15). District courts have discretion in determining the most equitable method of accounting for settlements between private parties in a contribution action, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit said, finding this approach consistent with both the letter and spirit of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act.
机译:超级基金法不要求联邦初审法院在私人当事方之间分配费用时采用特定的公式,联邦上诉法院于4月2日一致裁定扩大巡回法院之间的分歧(AmeriPride Serv。,Inc.诉Tex。E. Overseas,Inc.,2015 BL 94095,9th Cir。,No.12-17245,4/2/15)。美国第九巡回上诉法院说,地区法院可以自由裁量权决定在私人诉讼中私人当事方之间达成和解的最公平方法,美国第九巡回上诉法院认为,这种方法既符合《综合环境响应,赔偿》的文字和精神,和责任法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号