...
首页> 外文期刊>Environment reporter >Criminal Restitution May Include Superfund Costs, Sixth Circuit Rules
【24h】

Criminal Restitution May Include Superfund Costs, Sixth Circuit Rules

机译:刑事赔偿可能包括超级基金费用,第六巡回法院规则

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Criminal restitution payments to the Environmental Protection Agency for its Superfund hazardous waste clean up costs due to Clean Air Act violations are permissible, the Sixth Circuit ruled June 3 (United States v. Sawyer, 2016 BL 176904, 6th Cir., No. 15-5181, 6/3/16). The payments to the EPA for its costs in cleaning up an asbestos-ridden industrial site didn't violate the Mandatory Victim's Restitution Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3663A, which requires an "offense against property," the court said. Ruling on a question of first impression in the circuit, the three-judge panel said it didn't matter that the government had no possessory interest in the contaminated property.
机译:第六巡回法院于6月3日裁定(美国诉Sawyer,2016年BL 176904,第六巡回法院,第15- 5181,6/3/16)。向EPA支付清理石棉缠结的工业用地的费用并未违反美国18年《强制性受害者的赔偿法》。法院说,第3663A条要求“侵害财产罪”。由三名法官组成的小组就巡回赛中的第一印象问题作出裁决,称政府对被污染的财产没有任何所有权没有关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号