Wartime Pollution Case Belongs in Federal Court

MAEVE ALLSUP

首页> 外文期刊>Environment reporter >Wartime Pollution Case Belongs in Federal Court

【24h】

Wartime Pollution Case Belongs in Federal Court

机译：战时污染案属于联邦法院

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

The successor at interest to a manufacturing company that provided the federal government with materials duringWorld War Ⅱ was acting under color of federal law, and a pollution suit against it should be heard in federal court,the Seventh Circuit found Thursday.

机译：兴趣的后继公司在一家提供联邦政府的制造公司第二次世界大战在联邦法律的颜色下起作用，在联邦法院中应该听取污染诉讼，星期四发现的第七次电路。

著录项

来源
《Environment reporter》 |2020年第6期|1-2|共2页
作者
MAEVE ALLSUP;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Environmental Law: Groundwater Pollution; MTBE Court Jurisdiction, Procedure and Review: Federal Court Jurisdiction; Remand [J] . United States District Court Southern District of New York Oil and Gas Reporter . 2008,第6期

机译：环境法：地下水污染; MTBE法院的管辖权，程序和审查：联邦法院的管辖权;归还
2. Ruling: Coastal Lawsuits Belong In Federal Court [J] . The American Oil & Gas Reporter . 2021,第9期

机译：裁决：沿海诉讼属于联邦法院
3. Challenge to SIP Change Approval Doesn't Belong in Federal District Court [J] . Air Pollution Consultant . 2015,第3期

机译：联邦地方法院不对SIP变更批准提出质疑
4. Canadian Federal Election and Hashtags that Do Not Belong [C] . Thomas Magelinski, Mihovil Bartulovic, Kathleen M. Carley International Conference on Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling and Prediction and Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation . 2020

机译：加拿大联邦选举和不属于的Hashtags
5. The blank check: Supreme Court decision-making in national security claims and during wartime. [D] . Wong, U Jin. 2013

机译：空白支票：最高法院在国家安全索赔中和战时的决策。
6. Federal Court Rules Bias in Federally Aided Hospitals Unconstitutional [O] . 1963

机译：联邦法院裁定联邦资助医院的偏见违宪
7. The Function (or Malfunction) of Equity in the Charity Law of Canada’s Federal Courts: This essay explores what, if anything, it means for the Federal Court of Appeal to be a “court of equity” in the exercise of its jurisdiction over matters related to charitable registration under the Income Tax Act. The equitable jurisdiction over charities encompasses a number of curative principles, which the Court of Chancery traditionally invoked to save indefinite or otherwise defective charitable gifts. The author identifies some of these equitable principles and contemplates how their invocation might have altered the course of certain unsuccessful charitable registration appeals. She then considers the principal arguments for and against the Federal Court of Appeal applying these equitable principles when adjudicating matters related to registered charity status. [O] . 2016

机译：加拿大联邦法院《慈善法》中的平等职能（或失灵）：本文探讨了联邦上诉法院在行使对相关事宜的管辖权时成为“平等法院”的含义（如果有的话）根据《所得税法》进行慈善注册。对慈善组织的公平管辖权包括许多治疗原则，传统上，检举法院援引这些原则以保存无限期或其他有缺陷的慈善礼物。作者指出了其中一些公平原则，并考虑了其调用可能如何改变了某些不成功的慈善注册上诉的过程。然后，她在裁定与注册慈善身分有关的事项时，考虑支持和反对联邦上诉法院的主要论据，运用这些公平原则。

Wartime Pollution Case Belongs in Federal Court

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅