首页> 外文期刊>Environment reporter - Cases >Marquette Cty. Rd. Comm'n v. EPA
【24h】

Marquette Cty. Rd. Comm'n v. EPA

机译:马凯特县。路。 Comm诉EPA

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Federal district court will not reconsider dismissed claims brought by Michigan county road commission alleging that Environmental Protection Agency acted arbitrarily and capriciously in objecting to Clean Water Act Section 404 dredge and fill permit application, because: (1) court may reconsider decision that EPA's objections do not constitute final agency action subject to judicial review if commission demonstrates that, in light of U.S. Supreme Court decision finding that approved jurisdictional determination under act is final action, there was palpable defect by which court and parties were misled and correcting defect would lead to different result, and there is no adequate alternative to judicial review; (2) Supreme Court decision did not alter finality analysis for objections and commission has not demonstrated palpable defect in light of Supreme Court decision; and (3) applying for permit is not inadequate alternative to judicial review when permit is sought.
机译:联邦地方法院不会重新考虑由密歇根县公路委员会提出的声称环境保护署在反对《清洁水法》第404条疏and和装填许可证申请方面采取任意和任意行动的主张,因为:(1)法院可能会重新考虑关于EPA反对的决定如果委员会表明,根据美国最高法院的裁决,根据该法案批准的管辖权决定是最终诉讼,则该诉讼不构成要接受司法审查的最终代理诉讼,因此存在明显的缺陷,导致法院和当事方被误导,并且纠正缺陷会导致不同的结果结果,除了司法审查,没有其他选择; (2)最高法院的判决没有改变对异议的最终性分析,并且根据最高法院的判决,委员会没有表现出明显的缺陷; (3)申请许可证并不是寻求许可证时司法审查的替代选择。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environment reporter - Cases》 |2017年第15期|1879-1884|共6页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号