首页> 外文期刊>Environment international >Implementing systematic review techniques in chemical risk assessment: Challenges, opportunities and recommendations
【24h】

Implementing systematic review techniques in chemical risk assessment: Challenges, opportunities and recommendations

机译:在化学品风险评估中实施系统的审查技术:挑战,机遇和建议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Systematic review (SR) is a rigorous, protocol-driven approach designed to minimise error and bias when summarising the body of research evidence relevant to a specific scientific question. Taking as a comparator the use of SR in synthesising research in healthcare, we argue that SR methods could also pave the way for a "step change" in the transparency, objectivity and communication of chemical risk assessments (CRA) in Europe and elsewhere. We suggest that current controversies around the safety of certain chemicals are partly due to limitations in current CRA procedures which have contributed to ambiguity about the health risks posed by these substances. We present an overview of how SR methods can be applied to the assessment of risks from chemicals, and indicate how challenges in adapting SR methods from healthcare research to the CRA context might be overcome. Regarding the latter, we report the outcomes from a workshop exploring how to increase uptake of SR methods, attended by experts representing a wide range of fields related to chemical toxicology, risk analysis and SR Priorities which were identified include: the conduct of CRA-focused prototype SRs; the development of a recognised standard of reporting and conduct for SRs in toxicology and CRA; and establishing a network to facilitate research, communication and training in SR methods. We see this paper as a milestone in the creation of a research climate that fosters communication between experts in CRA and SR and facilitates wider uptake of SR methods into CRA. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
机译:系统评价(SR)是一种严格的,由协议驱动的方法,旨在在总结与特定科学问题相关的大量研究证据时最大程度地减少错误和偏见。作为比较,在医疗保健综合研究中使用SR的方法,我们认为SR方法还可以为欧洲和其他地区的化学风险评估(CRA)的透明性,客观性和沟通性“逐步改变”铺平道路。我们建议当前围绕某些化学药品安全性的争议部分是由于当前CRA程序的局限性导致对这些物质带来的健康风险的模棱两可。我们概述了如何将SR方法应用于化学品风险评估,并指出了如何克服将SR方法从医疗保健研究适应CRA的挑战。关于后者,我们报告了研讨会的成果,该研讨会探讨了如何增加SR方法的吸收,代表与化学毒理学,风险分析和SR优先领域有关的广泛领域的专家参加了此次研讨会,确定的重点包括:针对CRA原型SR;为毒理学和CRA中的SR制定公认的报告和行为标准;并建立一个网络,以促进SR方法的研究,交流和培训。我们认为本文是创造研究氛围的里程碑,该氛围促进了CRA和SR专家之间的交流,并促进了SR方法在CRA中的广泛采用。 (C)2015作者。由Elsevier Ltd.发布。这是CC BY许可下的开放访问文章(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environment international》 |2016年第julaaauga期|556-564|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Lancaster, Lancaster Environm Ctr, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, England;

    Univ Lancaster, Lancaster Environm Ctr, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, England;

    Stockholm Univ, Dept Environm Sci & Analyt Chem, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden;

    European Food Safety Author, Assessment & Methodol Support Unit, Via Carlo Magno 1-A, I-43126 Parma, Italy;

    Food Stand Agcy, Aviat House,125 Kingsway, London WC2B 6NH, England;

    Univ Brighton, Aquat Res Ctr, Lewes Rd, Brighton BN2 4GJ, E Sussex, England;

    Univ Southampton, Southampton Gen Hosp, MRC Lifecourse Epidemiol Unit, Southampton SO16 6YD, Hants, England;

    Univ Reading, Dept Geog & Environm Sci, Sch Archaeol Geog & Environm Sci, Reading RG6 6DW, Berks, England;

    Royal Soc Chem, Burlington House, London W1J 0BA, England;

    Publ Hlth England, Ctr Radiat Chem & Environm Hazards, Harwell Sci & Innovat Campus, Didcot OX11 0RQ, Oxon, England;

    Univ Basel, Swiss Ctr Appl Human Toxicol, Missionsstr 64, CH-4055 Basel, Switzerland;

    ECETOC, Ave Edmond Van Nieuwenhuyse 2 Bte 8, B-1160 Brussels, Belgium;

    Brunel Univ London, Inst Environm Hlth & Soc, Kingston Lane, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, Middx, England;

    EBTC, Stembergring 15, D-33106 Paderborn, Germany;

    Univ Calif San Francisco, Program Reprod Hlth & Environm, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA;

    Cochrahe Cent Execut, Cochrane Editorial Unit, St Albans House,57-9 Haymarket, London SW1Y 4QX, England;

    Cranfield Univ, Inst Environm Hlth Risks and Futures, Sch Energy Environm & Agrifood, Cranfield MK43 0AL, Beds, England;

    Royal Soc Chem, Burlington House, London W1J 0BA, England;

    UCL, Res Dept Clin Educ & Hlth Psychol, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT, England;

    Brunel Univ London, Inst Environm Hlth & Soc, Kingston Lane, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, Middx, England;

    Brunel Univ London, Hlth Econ Res Grp, Kingston Lane, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, Middx, England;

    Leibniz Res Ctr Working Environm & Human Factors, Neurobehav Toxicol, Ardeystr 67, D-44139 Dortmund, Germany;

    Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Wallingford 0X10 8BB, Oxon, England;

    Ramboll Environ, 1 Broad Gate, Leeds LS1 8EQ, W Yorkshire, England;

    Natl Inst Environm Sci NIEHS, DHHS, NIH, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA;

    Syngenta Ltd, Jealotts Hill Int Res Ctr, Bracknell RG42 6EY, Berks, England;

    Univ Newcastle Tyne, Ctr Rural Econ, Sch Agr Food & Rural Dev, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England;

    Royal Soc Chem, Burlington House, London W1J 0BA, England;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Risk assessment; Research synthesis; Environment; Chemicals; Systematic review; Toxicology;

    机译:风险评估;研究综合;环境;化学;系统评价;毒理学;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号