首页> 外文期刊>Environment and planning >From area-based initiatives to strategic partnerships: have we lost the meaning of regeneration?
【24h】

From area-based initiatives to strategic partnerships: have we lost the meaning of regeneration?

机译:从基于地区的计划到战略合作伙伴关系:我们失去了复兴的意义吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For forty years area-based initiatives (ABIs) were the primary tool used by UK governments to tackle problems of concentrated deprivation and dereliction. The last decade saw these initiatives end, replaced by new forms of city-wide or region-wide governance: Local Strategic Partnerships in England and Community Planning Partnerships in Scotland. It was argued in both policy documents and policy analysis that this change would deliver more effective regeneration for all communities. Challenging this narrative, I present this policy shift as a change in the meaning of regeneration policy using the methodology of interpretive policy analysis. The evidence from Scottish experience suggests that for a key policy actor-community activists in deprived neighbourhoods-the approach of ABIs had a great deal of meaning as regeneration. Furthermore, this meaning was still present a decade after an ABI had ended. Meanwhile, the newer strategic partnerships were delivering little meaningful change. This difference in meaning is used to reimagine strategic regeneration as a more positive process.
机译:四十年来,以地区为基础的倡议(ABI)是英国政府用来解决集中剥夺和失职问题的主要工具。在过去的十年中,这些举措结束了,取而代之的是新形式的城市范围或区域范围的治理:英格兰的地方战略合作伙伴关系和苏格兰的社区规划合作伙伴关系。政策文件和政策分析都认为,这一变化将为所有社区带来更有效的复兴。挑战这一叙述,我使用解释性政策分析的方法,将这一政策转变作为对再生政策含义的改变。苏格兰的经验表明,对于贫困地区的关键政策参与者-社区活动家来说,ABI的方法在意义上具有新生的意义。此外,在ABI结束十年后,这种含义仍然存在。同时,较新的战略伙伴关系几乎没有带来有意义的变化。含义上的这种差异被用来重新构想战略更新,将其视为一个更为积极的过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号