首页> 外文期刊>Environment and planning >Institutionalization or wither away? Twenty-five years of environmental policy integration under shifting governance models in Sweden
【24h】

Institutionalization or wither away? Twenty-five years of environmental policy integration under shifting governance models in Sweden

机译:制度化还是消亡?转变治理模式下的瑞典环境政策整合二十五年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Snapshot views of environmental policy integration (EPI) practices fail to consider the stability of EPI over time - both as aspiration and performance. This paper reviews the evolution of EPI over more than two decades at the national level in the agriculture and energy sectors in Sweden - an EPI pioneer. We study how the extent of EPI stability can be explained partly by shifting political priorities by governments and partly by underlying governance models (actors and organizational landscape and policy instruments used). Comparing the two sectors, the institutionalization of EPI appears to be stronger in the energy sector. In the agricultural sector, the current reform of the Common Agricultural Policy seems to imply decreasing prominence of EPI - due to shrinking budgets for environmental targets along with greater policy goals complexity. Overall, observed shifts in governance have been mildly conducive to EPI by providing an infrastructure, but further enhancements require clear political priority awarded to the environment.
机译:关于环境政策集成(EPI)实践的快照视图没有考虑到EPI随时间推移的稳定性-无论是期望还是绩效。本文回顾了EPI的先驱,瑞典在农业和能源领域在全国范围内EPI的发展超过二十年。我们研究了如何通过政府转移政治优先级以及部分通过基础治理模型(所使用的参与者,组织环境和政策工具)来解释EPI稳定性的程度。比较这两个部门,EPI的制度化似乎在能源部门更强。在农业领域,当前的《共同农业政策》改革似乎暗示着EPI的重要性正在下降-这是由于环境目标预算的缩减以及政策目标复杂性的增加。总体而言,通过提供基础设施,可观察到的治理转变已对EPI产生了温和的推动作用,但进一步的增强则需要对环境给予明确的政治优先考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号