首页> 外文学位 >Governance of early care and education: Politics and policy in France and Sweden.
【24h】

Governance of early care and education: Politics and policy in France and Sweden.

机译:早期护理和教育的治理:法国和瑞典的政治和政策。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Since the 1980s, policy interest has focused on early care and education to promote children's school readiness and support working parents. Despite other cutbacks to the welfare state, many advanced industrialized countries expanded access, improved quality, and developed more coherent early care and education during this period. Yet, there has been little scholarly attention to governance---how nations allocate responsibility for decision-making and delivery within and across administrative departments, levels of government, and public and private actors. I study the politics of early care and education governance (administrative integration, decentralization, and privatization) to better understand how institutions, actors, and ideas shape policy outcomes (quality, access, and coherence) in France and Sweden.;Although France and Sweden have experienced similar national governance trends, the broader national institutional context for education and social policy in each country sets the parameters within which early care and education governance evolves. I find that early care and education governance decisions shape politics, giving some actors and ideas power over others. In turn, these shifting responsibilities and relationships have consequences for quality, access, and coherence of early childhood services.;The consequences of governance are influenced by institutional history, political and economic context, and social constructions of the child. Both France and Sweden are moving toward a universal preschool model. As preschool becomes more integrated with elementary school, it gains more status, but loses early childhood specificity in teacher training and pedagogy. Decentralization brought greater diversity and flexibility of services, but also geographical disparities. Public-private partnerships have expanded provision to meet diverse needs of families, but public funding and regulation are necessary to promote equity. For the under threes, France and Sweden are on different paths. Swedish policy supports universal access to preschool, whereas French policy is more ambivalent and favors private, individual arrangements. The study provides a comparative perspective on current policy debates in the United States about integrating preschool into the education system, decentralizing responsibilities, and increasing the role of the private sector.
机译:自1980年代以来,对政策的关注一直集中在早期护理和教育上,以促进儿童入学准备和支持在职父母。尽管削减了福利国家的资金,但在此期间,许多先进的工业化国家仍扩大了医疗服务的获取范围,提高了质量,并发展了更加连贯的早期护理和教育。然而,学术界对治理的关注却很少,这是国家如何在行政部门,政府各级以及公共和私人行为体内部和之间分配决策和交付责任。我研究了早期护理和教育治理的政治(行政整合,权力下放和私有化),以更好地了解法国,瑞典的机构,行为者和思想如何塑造政策成果(质量,获取和连贯性)。经历了类似的国家治理趋势,每个国家在教育和社会政策方面的更广泛的国家机构环境为早期护理和教育治理的发展设定了参数。我发现,早期护理和教育治理决策影响着政治,赋予了某些行为者和观念以力量。反过来,这些不断变化的职责和关系也会影响幼儿服务的质量,获取和连贯性。治理的后果受到制度历史,政治和经济背景以及儿童社会结构的影响。法国和瑞典都在朝着普及学前教育模式迈进。随着学前班与小学的融合越来越多,它获得了更多的地位,但在教师培训和教学法上失去了幼儿期的特殊性。分权带来了更大的服务多样性和灵活性,也带来了地域差异。公私伙伴关系扩大了提供范围,以满足家庭的各种需求,但是公共资金和法规对促进公平是必不可少的。对于三岁以下儿童,法国和瑞典走的路不一样。瑞典的政策支持普及学前教育,而法国的政策则更具矛盾性,并且倾向于私人的,个人的安排。该研究为美国当前有关将学龄前儿童纳入教育系统,分散责任和增加私营部门作用的政策辩论提供了比较的观点。

著录项

  • 作者

    Neuman, Michelle Joy.;

  • 作者单位

    Columbia University.;

  • 授予单位 Columbia University.;
  • 学科 Education Early Childhood.;Sociology Public and Social Welfare.;Political Science Public Administration.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 238 p.
  • 总页数 238
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号