...
首页> 外文期刊>Environment and planning >A 'new water culture' on the Iberian Peninsula?Evaluating epistemic community impact on water resources management policy
【24h】

A 'new water culture' on the Iberian Peninsula?Evaluating epistemic community impact on water resources management policy

机译:伊比利亚半岛的“新水文化”?评估认知社区对水资源管理政策的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It is widely assumed that science should contribute to environmental policymaking. The epistemic communities framework provides a set of hypotheses regarding the conditions under which experts may serve as a conduit for such knowledge. An important critique of this approach, however, is that it is more often used metaphorically than empirically—analysts seldom identify such communities firmly on the basis of the fourfold belief system that defines them in the literature before proceeding with an analysis of policy impact. This article applies the defining components of the belief system set forth originally by Peter Haas to identify an epistemic community on the Iberian Peninsula promoting a "new water culture." Once an empirical identification of the community is established, the article seeks to answer the questions: Have experts promoting a "new water culture" influenced water resources management policy locally, nationally, and/or transnationally? Under what conditions is impact more or less likely?
机译:人们普遍认为科学应有助于环境政策的制定。认知社区框架提供了一组关于专家可作为此类知识传播渠道的条件的假设。但是,对该方法的一个重要批评是,它被比喻用于实证,而不是用于经验。在进行政策影响分析之前,分析师很少基于在文献中对社区进行定义的四重信念体系来牢固地识别这种社区。本文运用了彼得·哈斯(Peter Haas)最初提出的信念体系的定义成分,以识别伊比利亚半岛上的一个认知社区,以促进“新水文化”。建立社区的经验识别之后,本文将试图回答以下问题:倡导“新水文化”的专家是否会在本地,全国和/或跨国范围内影响水资源管理政策?在什么条件下或多或少会产生影响?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号