首页> 外文期刊>Environment and Planning. A >Researching the sustainable city: three modes of interdisciplinarity
【24h】

Researching the sustainable city: three modes of interdisciplinarity

机译:研究可持续城市:跨学科的三种模式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper we explore the practice of interdisciplinarity by examining how the UK research councils addressed the problem of the sustainable city during the 1990s. In developing their research programmes, the councils recognised that the problems of the sustainable city transcended conventional disciplinary boundaries and that an interdisciplinary approach was needed. In practice, however, initially radical proposals to research the city as a complex combination of science and technology and society contracted into more cognate collaborations that emphasised either science or technology or society, with the result that interdisciplinarity came to be located within research councils rather than between them. This, in turn, led to the development of a third kind of interdisciplinarity as the responsibility for making the connections between the research programmes was outsourced to the user communities- the local authorities. Unfortunately, local authorities struggled to find the resources to conduct this work so that the radical interdisciplinarity recommended at the start of the decade remained unaccomplished at the end. In describing these events we emphasise roles of paradigms and epistemic cultures in shaping research approaches and the complications they raise for the triangulation between approaches that is assumed in the idea of interdisciplinarity. We do not wish to be entirely negative, however, and conclude by suggesting some ways in which the quality and success of this much-needed interdisciplinary work could be increased.
机译:在本文中,我们通过研究英国研究委员会如何解决1990年代可持续城市的问题来探索跨学科的实践。理事会在制定研究计划时认识到,可持续城市的问题已经超越了传统的学科界限,需要采取跨学科的方法。但是,实际上,最初提出的关于将城市作为科学技术与社会的复杂结合进行研究的激进建议被压缩为更紧密的合作,强调科学,技术或社会,结果跨学科性逐渐转移到研究理事会而不是研究理事会中。它们之间。反过来,这导致了第三种跨学科的发展,因为将研究计划之间建立联系的责任外包给了用户社区,即地方当局。不幸的是,地方当局努力寻找资源来开展这项工作,以至于在本世纪初建议的根本性跨学科性到最后仍未实现。在描述这些事件时,我们强调范式和认知文化在塑造研究方法时所起的作用,以及它们为跨学科思想中假设的方法之间的三角关系带来的复杂性。但是,我们不希望完全消极,而是通过提出一些可以提高这一急需的跨学科工作的质量和成功的方法的结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号