首页> 外文期刊>Environment and planning >China's landed urbanization: neoliberalizing politics, land commodification, and municipal finance in the growth of metropolises
【24h】

China's landed urbanization: neoliberalizing politics, land commodification, and municipal finance in the growth of metropolises

机译:中国的土地城市化:大都市区增长中的新自由主义政治,土地商品化和市政金融

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Prevailing theories of uneven development see the growth of cities and regions as the spatial outcome of either the functioning of intrinsic agglomeration economies or the intrusion of global neoliberal market forces. Emphasis is placed on human resources and technology with land and capital usually taken for granted. This study of the growth of two leading Chinese metropolises-Beijing and Guangzhou-identifies a distinct strategy of urbanization financed by land commodification and actively pursued by Chinese municipal governments to contest with state power reshuffling in the era of neoliberalization. Contrary to popular notions, land commodification, rather than human capital or advanced technology, has played a role instrumental to the growth and transformation of China's metropolises. The popular practice of landed urbanization owes its political origins more to domestic state power reshuffling than to the intrusion of the global neoliberal agenda. State and market do not function as two diametrically opposing and self-contained entities but are characterized by their diverse and conflictual internal dynamics. Local states are found to have embraced and manipulated market forces for their political agenda. Theorization of global urbanism needs to go beyond the Euro-American comfort zone and to take seriously alternative practices and struggles found in the Global South.
机译:普遍存在的不均衡发展理论认为,城市和地区的增长是内在集聚经济运行或全球新自由主义市场力量入侵的空间结果。重点放在人力资源和技术上,而土地和资本通常被认为是理所当然的。这项对中国两个主要大城市北京和广州的发展的研究确定了一种独特的城市化战略,该战略由土地商品化提供资金,并且在新自由化时代中国政府积极追求与国家权力改组相抗衡。与普遍的观念相反,土地商品化而不是人力资本或先进技术在促进中国大都市的增长和转型中发挥了作用。土地城市化的普遍做法,其政治根源更多是由于国内国家权力的改组,而不是因为入侵了全球新自由主义议程。国家和市场并不是两个截然对立且自成一体的实体,它们的特点是其内部矛盾的多样性和冲突性。人们发现,地方政府在其政治议程中拥护和操纵了市场力量。全球城市主义的理论化需要超越欧美的舒适区,并认真对待在全球南方发现的替代做法和斗争。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号