首页> 外文期刊>Environment and planning >Architecture, symbolism, and function: the Nazi Party's 'Forum of the Movement'
【24h】

Architecture, symbolism, and function: the Nazi Party's 'Forum of the Movement'

机译:建筑,象征主义和功能:纳粹党的“运动论坛”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

As the birthplace of the Nazi Party, Munich assumed a prominent role in Hitler's plans to build a new Germany. The first major project of this Nazi building program aimed to redesign Munich's Konigsplatz Square as a new 'Forum of the Movement'. Contemporary writers and later scholars have generally seen the project as a successful and effective example of Hitler's ideas concerning urban design. Yet, informed by recent theoretical and methodological developments in geography, a critical analysis of contemporary sources and greater awareness of the square's new spatiality and functionality suggest that the project suffered from several deficiencies that limited its effectiveness both as a symbolic representation of Hitler's architectural aspirations and as a practical venue for party events. Indeed, the difficulties of co-opting this established public space likely played a pivotal role in shifting the focus of Hitler's monumental building program to new locations away from traditional urban centers and historical buildings.
机译:作为纳粹党的发源地,慕尼黑在希特勒建立新德国的计划中发挥了重要作用。纳粹建筑计划的第一个重大项目旨在将慕尼黑的国王广场重新设计为一个新的“运动论坛”。当代作家和后来的学者普遍认为该项目是希特勒有关城市设计思想的成功和有效的例子。然而,在地理学的最新理论和方法学发展的启发下,对当代资源进行了批判性分析,并对广场的新空间和功能有了更深入的了解,这表明该项目存在若干缺陷,这些缺陷既限制了其作为希特勒建筑志向的象征性体现,又限制了其有效性。作为聚会活动的实用场所。确实,选择这个既定的公共空间的困难可能在将希特勒的纪念性建筑计划的重点从传统的城市中心和历史建筑转移到新地点方面发挥了关键作用。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environment and planning》 |2010年第3期|P.397-424|共28页
  • 作者

    Joshua Hagen;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Geography, Marshall University, One John Marshall Drive, Huntington,WV 25755-2664, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号