...
首页> 外文期刊>Central European History >The Nazi Party: The Anatomy of a People’s Party, 1919–1933. By Paul Madden and Detlef Muehlberger. Berne: Peter Lang. 2007. Pp. 329.Cloth E77.30/$94.97. ISBN 978-3-03910-542-7.
【24h】

The Nazi Party: The Anatomy of a People’s Party, 1919–1933. By Paul Madden and Detlef Muehlberger. Berne: Peter Lang. 2007. Pp. 329.Cloth E77.30/$94.97. ISBN 978-3-03910-542-7.

机译:纳粹党:人民党的解剖学,1919–1933年。 Paul Madden和Detlef Muehlberger。伯恩:彼得·朗。 2007。 329.布料E77.30 / $ 94.97。 ISBN 978-3-03910-542-7。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A quarter century has passed since the publication of Richard F. Hamilton’sWhonVoted for Hitler? (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1982), which shooknthe foundations of the hallowed, originally Marxist-based, assumption thatnNazism was essentially a movement of the “middle classes” with only verynminimal involvement of the “proletariat” of factory workers or the uppernclasses. While Hamilton and the quickly following The Nazi Voter: The SocialnFoundations of Fascism in Germany, 1919–1933 by Tom Childers (Chapel Hill,nNC: University of North Carolina Press, 1983) broke open the old taboo, annumber of others had prepared the way, including Michael Kater’s critical quan-ntitative studies of the social composition of Nazi organizations and voters and thendoctoral research and first publications by the two authors of this book. A wavenof empirical studies followed, based on statistical data that demonstrated that thenNazi Party, had, in fact, been what it had claimed, namely a true mass party thatnappealed to voters from all classes—a critical factor in its success. Oddly, as thenauthors point out, the new view of the party’s make-up was actually a rediscov-nery, which mirrored the perceptions of contemporary observers. Opponents andnrefugees of the Nazi regime had already noted the breakdown of class loyalties—nmost famously Hannah Arendt in her chapter “A Classless Society” in ThenOrigins of Totalitarianism—albeit not supported by sophisticated quantitativenanalysis. Labor leaders in exile such as the Bavarian Social Democrat and laternMinister President Wilhelm Hoegner felt deeply betrayed by large numbers ofnworkers who voted for the Nazis
机译:自理查德·汉密尔顿(Richard F. Hamilton)的《为希特勒(Hitler)投票》(WhonVoted for Hitler)以来,已经过去了25年。 (新泽西州普林斯顿市:普林斯顿大学出版社,1982年),这动摇了最初以马克思主义为基础的神圣的假设,即纳粹主义本质上是“中产阶级”的运动,而工厂工人或工人的“无产阶级”的参与极少。上层阶级。汉密尔顿和紧随其后的纳粹选民:德国法西斯主义的社会基础,1919年至1933年,汤姆·Childers(教堂山,nNC:北卡罗来纳大学出版社,1983年)打破了旧的禁忌,许多其他人已经做好了准备包括迈克尔·凯特(Michael Kater)对纳粹组织和选民的社会组成进行的批判性定量研究,然后是本书的两位作者所进行的博士研究和第一本出版物。随后的大量实证研究是基于统计数据的,这些数据表明当时纳粹党实际上就是它声称的那样,即真正的群众党吸引了所有阶层的选民,这是其成功的关键因素。奇怪的是,正如当时的作者所指出的那样,对党的化妆的新见解实际上是重新发现,反映了当代观察家的看法。纳粹政权的反对者和庇护者已经注意到阶级忠诚度的崩溃-尽管在极权主义的ThenOrigins中她最著名的汉娜·阿伦特(Hannah Arendt)在她的“无阶级社会”一章中提到了这一点,尽管它并没有得到复杂的定量分析的支持。流亡的劳工领袖,例如巴伐利亚社会民主党和后来的部长威廉·霍格纳总统,被投票支持纳粹的大量非裔工人深深地背叛了

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号