首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >Advisors Express Concern Over Epa Risk Study For New No2 Naaqs
【24h】

Advisors Express Concern Over Epa Risk Study For New No2 Naaqs

机译:顾问对新二号Naaqs的Epa风险研究表示关注

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

EPA's advisors are expressing concern that the risk assessment the agency is developing as part of its review of the nitrogen dioxide (NO2) air quality standard is based on assumptions that may not be representative of real-world exposure and say the court-ordered schedule for the review is limiting EPA's ability to respond to these concerns. Agency staff said on an Oct. 22 teleconference with advisors that several factors have contributed to delaying the review, including the advisors' request that an additional analysis be added to the assessment and a memo from deputy administrator Marcus Peacock that mandated that all analysis be completed before the rulemaking process begins. EPA is planning to meet later this week with the environmentalists who sued to set the standard in order to ask to delay the court-ordered schedule, which requires the air standard to be proposed in May and finalized in December, Lydia Wegman of EPA's Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards said. Members of EPA's Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee held the Oct. 22 teleconference to discuss the comments they plan to send to EPA next week on the risk and exposure assessment for the review of the health-protective national ambient air quality standard for NO2. The advisors said several factors in the assessment may be based on faulty assumptions, and said the assessment does not adequately portray the uncertainty of the analysis.
机译:EPA的顾问表示担忧,该机构在对其二氧化氮(NO2)空气质量标准进行审查时所进行的风险评估所依据的假设可能无法代表现实世界的暴露,并表示法院命令的时间表该审查限制了EPA应对这些问题的能力。该机构工作人员在10月22日与顾问举行的电话会议上说,一些因素导致了审查的延迟,其中包括顾问要求在评估中添加其他分析,以及副管理人员Marcus Peacock的备忘录,要求完成所有分析。在规则制定过程开始之前。 EPA计划在本周晚些时候与环保主义者会面,后者要求制定标准,以要求推迟法院下令的时间表,这要求在5月提出空气标准,并在12月最终确定空气标准,EPA办公室的Lydia Wegman空气质量计划和标准说。 EPA的清洁空气科学咨询委员会成员于10月22日举行电话会议,讨论他们计划下周就评估NO2的健康保护性国家环境空气质量标准的风险和暴露评估向EPA发送评论。顾问们说,评估中的几个因素可能是基于错误的假设,并说评估没有充分描述分析的不确定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号