...
首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >High Court Justices Doubt Broad CERCLA Preemption Of State Tort Limits
【24h】

High Court Justices Doubt Broad CERCLA Preemption Of State Tort Limits

机译:高等法院法官怀疑CERCLA对州侵权限制的宽泛抢占

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Supreme Court justices appeared skeptical that Congress intended to broadly preempt state limits on tort claims filed by plaintiffs who have been exposed to chemicals at waste sites when it enacted the Superfund law. "I find it hard to read [the law] that way," Justice Antonin Scalia told the attorney for a group of North Carolina plaintiffs during oral arguments April 23. At issue in CTS Corporation v. Waldburger is whether the federal "discovery rule" in the Superfund law that prevents state statutes of limitations on tort suits from beginning until a victim has discovered his or her injury also applies to so-called statutes of repose, which set an end date on liability, regardless of whether an injury is known.
机译:最高法院的大法官对此表示怀疑,认为国会打算在颁布《超级基金法》时大范围超越州对原告提出的侵权要求的限制,这些原告是在废物现场接触过化学品的原告。大法官安东宁·斯卡利亚(Antonin Scalia)在4月23日的口头辩论中对一组北卡罗来纳州原告的律师说:“我很难以这种方式阅读[法律]。”在CTS Corporation诉Waldburger案中,联邦“发现规则”是否存在争议《超级基金法》中的一项规定禁止从侵权行为的诉讼时效开始直到受害人发现自己受伤之前,该规定也适用于所谓的休养法,该法规定了赔偿责任的终止日期,无论是否已知伤害。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号