首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >4th Circuit Denies Rehearing En Banc In Superfund Arranger Liability Ruling
【24h】

4th Circuit Denies Rehearing En Banc In Superfund Arranger Liability Ruling

机译:第四巡回法院否认在超级基金安排人责任裁定中重新演练

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit has denied a request to grant a rehearing en bane of a March 20 decision that dismissed "arranger" liability for an electric utility that sold used transformers containing polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). The 4th Circuit April 17 rejected the request by Consolidation Coal Company and PCS Phosphate Company, two companies seeking to recoup cleanup costs at a North Carolina Superfund site. They argued that the court's narrow view of "intent to dispose" under arranger liability will defeat the Superfund law's goal of having polluters pay. "[T]he majority's narrow interpretation will have devastating consequences for [the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation & Liability Act (CERCLA)] and the environment generally," petitioners Consolidation Coal Company and PCS Phosphate Company argued in their April 3 petition to the 4th Circuit to rehear en banc a 2-1 split decision in the closely watched case Consolidation Coal Co. v. Georgia Power Co.
机译:美国第四巡回上诉法院拒绝了对3月20日裁决的复审请求,该裁决取消了对电力公司的“安排人”责任,该电力公司出售了含有多氯联苯(PCB)的二手变压器。 4月17日的第四巡回法院拒绝了Consolidation Coal Company和PCS Phosphate Company的请求,两家公司希望在北卡罗莱纳州的Superfund站点收回清理费用。他们争辩说,法院对安排人责任下“意图处置”的狭view观点将挫败《超级基金法》要求污染者付费的目标。上访者Consolidation Coal Company和PCS Phosphate Company在其4月3日的第四次请愿书中指出:“多数人的狭interpretation解释将对[全面环境响应,补偿和责任法(CERCLA)]和整个环境造成毁灭性后果。”在备受关注的Consolidation Coal Co.诉Georgia Power Co.一案中,法院预审了2-1拆分决定。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Inside EPA's environmental policy alert》 |2015年第10期|8-8|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:04:36

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号