首页> 外文期刊>Engineers Australia >Bypassing registration requirements
【24h】

Bypassing registration requirements

机译:绕过注册要求

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

My previous letter in the February issue commented on EA support for the prosecution of Peter Ruffini for failing to keep his RPEQ registration current. It was answered by Dr Peter Greenwood in the March issue. It was easy to accept and support much of his contribution. However, it is unfortunate that one of my key points was ignored. While government departments and some larger private construction projects will specify registered engineers, many large and small private employers will not welcome the additional inflexibility in their workforce and can easily avoid it by calling (titling) their engineers something else. My firm has very well qualified clients performing engineering tasks in this way.
机译:我在2月号中的前一封信评论了EA支持起诉Peter Ruffini未能保持其RPEQ注册最新状态的支持。彼得·格林伍德博士(Peter Greenwood)在3月号上回答了这个问题。接受和支持他的许多贡献很容易。但是,不幸的是我的关键要点被忽略了。尽管政府部门和一些较大的私人建筑项目将指定注册工程师,但许多大小型私人雇主都不会欢迎他们在工作中出现额外的灵活性,可以通过打电话(称呼)工程师其他方式轻松避免这种情况。我公司有非常合格的客户以这种方式执行工程任务。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Engineers Australia》 |2013年第4期|10-10|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号