首页> 外文期刊>Engineering news-record >'Maybe this kind of work isn't for you'
【24h】

'Maybe this kind of work isn't for you'

机译:“也许这种工作不适合你”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This issue has been cited in judges' decisions in many sexual-harassment cases. This year, a Louisiana appellate court reversed the decision in EEOC v. Boh Bros. in which a male ironworker, Kerry Woods, originally won his lawsuit against Boh over sexual harassment by a male supervisor in Louisiana. The judges reasoned in their ruling that, since there was no evidence the harasser was attracted to the victim and the victim did not deviate from gender norms, there was no support for a Title VII case against Boh (ENR 8/13 p. 18). Data from the sampling of sexual-harassment cases filed against construction companies since 2002 support the notion that these cases, particularly ones based on male-on-male sexual-harassment charges, have difficulty getting to trial. About a third of the cases were granted summary judgement-a judge's decision to rule in favor of the defendant before the jury is allowed to return a verdict. Almost one out of 10 cases were dismissed before a jury verdict. Fewer than one out of three were denied summary judgment, meaning they went to a jury trial.
机译:在许多性骚扰案件中,法官的裁决中都提到了这个问题。今年,路易斯安那州上诉法院推翻了EEOC诉Boh Bros.案中的裁决,该裁决中,男性铁工Kerry Woods最初在路易斯安那州因男性上司的性骚扰赢得了对Boh的诉讼。法官在裁决中认为,由于没有证据表明骚扰者被受害者吸引,而且受害者没有偏离性别规范,因此不支持针对Boh的VII头案(ENR 8/13 p。18)。 。自2002年以来针对建筑公司的性骚扰案件抽样数据表明,这些案件,尤其是基于男性对男性性骚扰指控的案件,很难进行审判。大约三分之一的案件获得了简易判决,即在陪审团获准作出裁决之前,法官作出有利于被告的裁决。在陪审团作出判决之前,十分之十的案件被驳回。只有不到三分之二的人被拒绝即席判决,这意味着他们已进入陪审团审判。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Engineering news-record》 |2012年第15期|27-27|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:14:08

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号