...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy >Techno-economics and environmental analysis of energy storage for a student residence under a South African time-of-use tariff rate
【24h】

Techno-economics and environmental analysis of energy storage for a student residence under a South African time-of-use tariff rate

机译:南非分时使用费率下学生宿舍储能的技术经济学和环境分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Time-of-Use has been introduced in South Africa as part of demand side management measures. Battery energy storage (BES) can take advantage of energy price arbitrage under favourable pricing regimes. However, the challenge is to what extent will the introduced policy favour the installation of BES at residential accommodations? The tools to assess suitability of installing BES exist but they come at a cost. In this study, we improved upon existing methodology and implemented it in Microsoft Excel to assess techno-economic viability and environmental benefits of using BES. The approach showed that none of the three BES technologies investigated was economically viable at the prevailing average rate of 0.1442 $/kWh for peak electricity. The Monte Carlo simulation implemented suggests that the minimum mean price of peak needed for the BES system to break even range between 0.2560 - 0.2919 $/kWh. At 50% discount in storage medium cost and 100% increase in the price of peak, the BES will only break even when the average price of peak is 0.2043 $/kWh at maximum cycling cost that range between 0.1077 0.1560 $/kWh. The study concluded that reduction in the cost of storage medium has more impact on economic viability than increasing only peak price of electricity. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:使用时间已在南非引入,作为需求方管理措施的一部分。电池储能(BES)可以在有利的定价机制下利用能源价格套利。但是,挑战在于所引入的政策在多大程度上有利于在住宅中安装BES?存在评估安装BES的适用性的工具,但要付出一定的代价。在本研究中,我们改进了现有方法,并在Microsoft Excel中实施了该方法,以评估使用BES的技术经济可行性和环境效益。该方法表明,所研究的三种BES技术在当前峰值电价平均为0.1442 $ / kWh时,在经济上都不可行。实施的蒙特卡洛模拟表明,BES系统收支平衡所需的最低峰值平均价格为0.2560-0.2919 $ / kWh。以50%的存储介质成本折扣和峰值价格100%的涨幅,BES仅在峰值平均价格为0.2043 $ / kWh且最大循环成本介于0.1077 0.1560 $ / kWh时才能收支平衡。该研究得出的结论是,与仅提高峰值电价相比,降低存储介质的成本对经济可行性的影响更大。 (C)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号