...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy >Benefit allocation for distributed energy network participants applying game theory based solutions
【24h】

Benefit allocation for distributed energy network participants applying game theory based solutions

机译:应用基于博弈论的解决方案为分布式能源网络参与者分配利益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study develops a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model integrating energy system optimization and benefit allocation scheme of the building distributed heating network. Based on the proposed model, the minimized annual total cost, energy generators configuration, optimal operation strategy and heating pipeline lay-out of the distributed energy network can be determined. Moreover, four benefit allocation schemes (Shapely, the Nucleolus, DP equivalent method, Nash-Harsanyi) based on cooperative game theory are employed to deal with the benefit (reduced annual cost) assignment among the building clusters, while considering the stability and fairness of each scheme. As a case study, a local area including three buildings located in Shanghai, China is selected for analysis. The simulation results indicate that the ground coalition in which all buildings cooperate with each other by sharing and interchanging the thermal energy yields the best economic performance for the distributed energy network as a whole. In addition, different allocation schemes may result in diversified outcomes in terms of the fairness and stability, which are measured by the Shapley-Shubik Power Index and the Propensity to Disrupt value, respectively. For the current case study, the Shapely value method is recognized to be the most acceptable allocation scheme from both viewpoints. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:本研究开发了一种混合整数线性规划(MILP)模型,该模型集成了能源系统优化和建筑物分布式供热网络的收益分配方案。基于所提出的模型,可以确定分布式能源网络的最小年度总成本,发电机组配置,最佳运行策略和供热管道布局。此外,在考虑建筑群稳定性和公平性的基础上,采用了基于合作博弈理论的四种利益分配方案(Shapely,Nucleolus,DP等效法,Nash-Harsanyi)来处理建筑物群之间的利益(降低的年度成本)分配。每个方案。作为案例研究,选择了一个包括位于中国上海的三座建筑物的区域进行分析。仿真结果表明,所有建筑物通过共享和交换热能而相互协作的地面联盟对于整个分布式能源网络而言具有最佳的经济性能。此外,就公平性和稳定性而言,不同的分配方案可能会导致结果多样化,这分别由Shapley-Shubik力量指数和中断倾向值来衡量。对于当前的案例研究,从两个角度来看,Shapely值方法都被认为是最可接受的分配方案。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号