首页> 外文期刊>Energy >Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of single-pressure single- stage and multi-stage CO_2 transcritical power cycles for engine waste heat recovery: A comparative study
【24h】

Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of single-pressure single- stage and multi-stage CO_2 transcritical power cycles for engine waste heat recovery: A comparative study

机译:单压力单级和多级CO_2跨临界功率循环用于发动机余热回收的能效经济分析和优化:比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The present work mainly focuses on the thermodynamic and exergoeconomic comparisons between the novel single-pressure multi-stage CDTPCs (carbon dioxide transcritical power cycles) and single-pressure single-stage CDTPC for engine waste heat recovery. A method based on exergy fuel distribution is proposed to calculate the fuel cost for the bottoming CDTPCs. Parametric analysis is conducted to study effects of the decision variables on the performances of the considered CDTPCs, which are also optimized and compared. The thermodynamic study shows that the double-stage CDTPC can produce the highest net power output of 517.27 kW for a 2928 kW engine at exhaust gas temperature of 470 degrees C. The exergoeconomic study reveals that the single-stage CDTPC has the lowest total unit cost when exhaust gas temperature is 300-600 degrees C and the double-stage CDTPC is recommended when exhaust gas temperature is 530-600 degrees C due to better thermodynamic and exergoeconomic performances. Meanwhile, the triple stage CDTPC is not recommended when exhaust gas temperature is 300-600 degrees C considering thermodynamics and exergoeconomics. A multi-objective optimization is also conducted to obtain an optimal condition for the considered CDTPCs for the case study. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:目前的工作主要集中在新型单压多级CDTPC(二氧化碳跨临界功率循环)和单压单级CDTPC(用于发动机废热回收)之间的热力学和能效比较。提出了一种基于火用燃料分配的方法来计算底部CDTPC的燃料成本。进行参数分析以研究决策变量对所考虑的CDTPC性能的影响,并对其进行了优化和比较。热力学研究表明,对于排气温度为470摄氏度的2928 kW发动机,双级CDTPC可以产生最高的净功率输出517.27 kW。从能效经济方面的研究表明,单级CDTPC的总单位成本最低当排气温度为300-600摄氏度时,建议采用双级CDTPC,因为排气温度为530-600摄氏度,这是因为其具有更好的热力学和能效性能。同时,考虑到热力学和能效经济学,当废气温度为300-600摄氏度时,不建议使用三级CDTPC。还进行了多目标优化,以为案例研究获得考虑的CDTPC的最佳条件。 (C)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy》 |2018年第1期|559-577|共19页
  • 作者

    Wang Shun-sen; Wu Chuang; Li Jun;

  • 作者单位

    Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Shaanxi Engn Lab Turbomachinery & Power Equipment, Inst Turbomachinery, Sch Energy & Power Engn, 28 Xianning West Rd, Xian 710049, Shaanxi, Peoples R China;

    Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Shaanxi Engn Lab Turbomachinery & Power Equipment, Inst Turbomachinery, Sch Energy & Power Engn, 28 Xianning West Rd, Xian 710049, Shaanxi, Peoples R China;

    Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Shaanxi Engn Lab Turbomachinery & Power Equipment, Inst Turbomachinery, Sch Energy & Power Engn, 28 Xianning West Rd, Xian 710049, Shaanxi, Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Carbon dioxide transcritical power cycle; Waste heat recovery; Thermodynamic; Exergoeconomic; Optimization;

    机译:二氧化碳跨临界功率循环;余热回收;热力学;能效经济;优化;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号