...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy >Biomass direct gasification for electricity generation and natural gas replacement in the lime kilns of the pulp and paper industry: A techno-economic analysis
【24h】

Biomass direct gasification for electricity generation and natural gas replacement in the lime kilns of the pulp and paper industry: A techno-economic analysis

机译:纸浆和造纸工业石灰窑的发电和天然气替换生物质直接气化:技术经济分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study shows a comparative techno-economic analysis of the integration of biomass gasification for generation of producer gas to be used in electricity production and to replace natural gas in the lime kilns of the pulp and paper industry. Three study cases with alternative configurations of the energy system integrating biomass gasification were analysed, including or not the co-generation of electricity and thermal energy, namely: i) Case I, for generation of electricity from residual forest biomass (RFB) in an integrated gasification combined cycle system, ii) Case II, generation of producer gas by RFB gasification for replacement of natural gas in the burners of a lime kiln, and iii) Case III, as an integration of Cases I and II for combined production of electricity and heat. Residual forest biomass from eucalyptus logging activities for feedstock processing for the pulp and paper industry was considered as fuel for direct (air) gasification in bubbling fiuidized bed. The analysis made is supported on review reports, namely, the evaluation of the existing literature on investment projects in biomass power plants, and on experi-mental investigation for determining the composition of the producer gas from gasification of the selected feedstock. An economic model was developed that combines the net present value, internal rate of return and payback period. The main results of the energy system analysis show that the net electricity generation is between 72 and 83 GWh/year, while the production of CaO in the lime kiln supported by combustion of producer gas, is 82.12 kt/year, and a global energy efficiency between 21.70 and 34.17 % is achieved for the analysed configurations of the energy system. The results of the economic analysis show a positive NPV, an IRR greater than the discount rate and a PBP less than the useful life of the plant. The sensitivity analysis shows quite favorable investment projections given the low probability that the NPV will reach negative values and compromise the economic viability of the project. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:本研究表明了对生产者气体的生物量气化集成的比较技术经济分析,以用于电力生产,替代纸浆和造纸工业的石灰窑中的天然气。分析了整合生物质气化的能量系统的替代配置的三种研究案例,包括或不是电力和热能的共生,即:i)案例I,用于在集成的群中产生来自残留的森林生物量(RFB)的电力气化联合循环系统,ii)案例II,通过RFB气化产生生产的生产者,用于更换石灰窑的燃烧器中的天然气,以及案例I和II的整合,用于组合电力和二热。来自桉树原料处理的桉树测井活动的残留森林生物量被认为是燃料造成的燃料(空气)气化的燃料。在审查报告中得到了分析,即评估生物量发电厂的投资项目的现有文献,以及用于测定所选原料气化的生产者的组成。制定了经济模式,将净目前价值,内部回报和投资回收期结合起来。能源系统分析的主要结果表明,净发电量为72至83 GWH /年,而通过生产者燃烧支持的石灰窑中的CaO的生产是82.12千克/年,以及全球能效对于分析的能量系统的配置,实现了21.70和34.17%。经济分析的结果显示出阳性NPV,不大于折扣率和PBP,而不是植物的使用寿命。敏感性分析表明,鉴于NPV将达到负值的低概率和损害项目的经济可行性,鉴于较低的投资预测。 (c)2021 elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号