首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Techno-economic analysis of electricity and heat production by co-gasification of coal, biomass and waste tyre in South Africa
【24h】

Techno-economic analysis of electricity and heat production by co-gasification of coal, biomass and waste tyre in South Africa

机译:南非通过煤,生物质和废轮胎的共气化发电和供热的技术经济分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

South Africa has large deposit of coal that supports about 95% of electric power generation in the country. The fuel is fast depleting, though the current reserve may serve for the next century. However, the emissions from the coal projects huge threat to the environment. Similarly, the country has abundant solid wastes that can be co-gasified with coal to H-2 enriched syngas for clean energy production. A 5 MW combined heat and power plant was studied using different coal-to-solid waste ratios of 1:1, 3:2, and 4:1 and economy of the plant was evaluated with feedstock costing (WFC) and without feedstock costing (WOFC). The lower heating value of the fuels, determined from a model equation was applied to estimate the annual feedstock requirement and the feed rate. Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), and Payback Period (PBP) were used to evaluate the viability of the power generation at the 10th, 11th, 17th and 18th year business periods. The predicted optimum period of the plant is the 10th year. The use of Coal + Pine saw-dust (PSD) blend of blend ratio 1:1, is the most attractive feedstock for the energy generation. A higher profit of about 13.82%, and 23.56% were estimated for the use of Coal + PSD as compared to the use of 100% Matla coal at WFC and WOFC, thus; enabling a savings of about 1,868.81 t feedstock per annum. The use of Coal + PSD blend of blend ratio 1:1 reduces the CO, CO2, SO2, and NOx emissions by 3.4%, 23.28%, 22.9%, and 0.55%, respectively. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:南非拥有大量煤炭,可支撑该国约95%的发电量。燃料正在迅速消耗,尽管目前的储备可能在下个世纪发挥作用。但是,煤炭的排放对环境构成了巨大威胁。同样,该国拥有丰富的固体废物,可以与煤炭一起气化为富含H-2的合成气,用于生产清洁能源。研究了一个5 MW的热电联产电厂,使用了1:1、3:2和4:1的不同煤/固废比,并通过原料成本计算(WFC)和无原料成本评估了电厂的经济性( WOFC)。根据模型方程确定的燃料较低的热值用于估算年度原料需求和进料速度。净现值(NPV),内部收益率(IRR)和投资回收期(PBP)用于评估发电业务在第10、11、17和18年的生存能力。预计工厂的最佳时期是第10年。混合比为1:1的煤炭+松木锯末(PSD)混合物是产生能量的最有吸引力的原料。与在WFC和WOFC中使用100%Matla煤炭相比,使用煤+ PSD的利润估计更高,分别约为13.82%和23.56%。每年可节省约1,868.81吨原料。混合比例为1:1的Coal + PSD混合物的使用分别将CO,CO2,SO2和NOx排放量减少了3.4%,23.28%,22.9%和0.55%。 (C)2018 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号