...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy >Energy use efficiency and cost-benefits analysis of rice cultivation: A study on conventional and alternative methods in Myanmar
【24h】

Energy use efficiency and cost-benefits analysis of rice cultivation: A study on conventional and alternative methods in Myanmar

机译:水稻栽培能源效率和成本效益分析 - 缅甸常规和替代方法研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Energy is a vital component of every stage of the crop production process.Therefore,ensuring its efficient use confers tremendous environmental benefits over time.This paper aims to assess the energy use efficiency (EUE) and cost-benefits analysis of four different rice cultivation methods in Central Myanmar from a sustainability standpoint.The cultivation methods analysed include two alternative methods; the system of rice intensification (SRI) method (T_1)and the modified SRI method (T_2);as well as two conventional rice cultivation methods practised by farmers in that region; the transplanting method (T_3) and the direct seeding method (T_4).The study found that alternative rice cultivation methods required significantly less total energy inputs than conventional methods.It also showed that EUE was significantly higher in T_2 compared to T_3 and T_4.The cost-benefit analysis indicates that the alternative rice cultivation methods were significantly higher than those of conventional methods.It found that the energy indices and economic parameters of T_2 were affected positively as indicated by the fewer inputs required to produce rice using this method.Finally,the study concluded that the modified SRI method is promising for rice cultivation strategy in Central Myanmar and its adjoining regions.
机译:能源是作物生产过程的每个阶段的重要组成部分。因此,确保其有效利用随着时间的推移,旨在评估四种不同水稻种植方法的能量利用效率(EuE)和成本效益分析。从可持续发展的角度来看,在中部缅甸。分析的培养方法包括两种替代方法;水稻强化(SRI)方法(T_1)和改性SRI方法(T_2);以及该地区农民实施的两种常规水稻栽培方法;移植方法(T_3)和直接播种方法(T_4)。该研究发现,替代水稻培养方法比常规方法明显更小的总能量输入。还表明,与T_3和T_4相比,T_2的EUE显着高。成本效益分析表明,替代水稻栽培方法显着高于常规方法。发现T_2的能量指标和经济参数正如使用该方法生产水稻所需的输入所需的输入所示。最后,该研究得出结论,改良的SRI方法是中部缅甸和毗邻地区的水稻培养策略的对。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy》 |2021年第1期|119104.1-119104.10|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Faculty of Environmental Management Prince of Songkla University Songkhla 90110 Thailand;

    Faculty of Environmental Management Prince of Songkla University Songkhla 90110 Thailand Coastal Oceanography and Climate Change Research Center Prince of Songkhla University Songkhla 90110 Thailand;

    Faculty of Environmental Management Prince of Songkla University Songkhla 90110 Thailand Coastal Oceanography and Climate Change Research Center Prince of Songkhla University Songkhla 90110 Thailand Marine and Coastal Resources Institute Prince of Songkla University Songkhla 90110 Thailand;

    Institute of Sustainable Energy Universiti Tenaga Nasional Jalan 1KRAM-UNITEN 43000 Kajang Selangor Malaysia;

    Solar Energy Research Institute The National University of Malaysia 43600 Bangi Selangor Malaysia;

    Faculty of Environmental Management Prince of Songkla University Songkhla 90110 Thailand Environmental Assessment and Technology for Hazardous Waste Management Research Center Prince of Songkla University Songkhla 90110 Thailand;

    Thammasat Business School Thammasat University Bangkok Thailand;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Myanmar; Modified SRI; Energy input; Energy output; Economic analysis;

    机译:缅甸;修改SRI;能量输入;能量输出;经济分析;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号