首页> 外文期刊>Energy sources >Making the sun shine at night: comparing the cost of dispatchable concentrating solar power and photovoltaics with storage
【24h】

Making the sun shine at night: comparing the cost of dispatchable concentrating solar power and photovoltaics with storage

机译:让阳光照耀在夜晚:比较可调度集中太阳能和储存光伏的成本

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Sustainable electricity systems need renewable and dispatchable energy sources. Solar energy is an abundant source of renewable energy globally which is, though, by nature only available during the day, and especially in clear weather conditions. We compare three technology configurations able to provide dispatchable solar power at times without sunshine: Photovoltaics (PV) combined with battery (BESS) or thermal energy storage (TES) and concentrating solar power (CSP) with TES. Modeling different periods without sunshine, we find that PV+BESS is competitive for shorter storage durations while CSP+TES gains economic advantages for longer storage periods (also over PV+TES). The corresponding tipping points lie at 2-3 hours (current cost), and 4-10 hours if expectations on future cost developments are taken into consideration. PV+TES becomes only more competitive than CSP+TES with immense additional cost reductions of PV. Hence, there remain distinct niches for two technologies: PV+BESS for short storage durations and CSP+TES for longer ones.
机译:可持续电力系统需要可再生和可调度的能源。太阳能是全球可再生能源的丰富来源,但是,在当天仅提供自然,特别是在清晰的天气条件下。我们比较了三次技术配置,能够在没有阳光的情况下提供调度太阳能:光伏(PV)与电池(BESS)或热能存储(TES)和具有TES的集中太阳能(CSP)。在没有阳光的情况下建模不同的时期,我们发现PV + BESS对较短的储存持续时间具有竞争力,而CSP + TES获得了更长的储存期(也超过PV + TES)的经济优势。如果考虑到对未来成本发展的预期,相应的裁员点位于2-3小时(当前成本),4-10小时。 PV + TES仅比CSP + TES更竞争,具有巨大的PV额外成本降低。因此,两种技术仍然存在明显的利基:用于短存储持续时间的PV + BESS,更长的储存持续时间和CSP + TES。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号