首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >A qualitative evaluation of policy instruments used to improve energy performance of existing private dwellings in the Netherlands
【24h】

A qualitative evaluation of policy instruments used to improve energy performance of existing private dwellings in the Netherlands

机译:对用于改善荷兰现有私人住宅的能源绩效的政策工具的定性评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Climate change policies in the Netherlands recognise the importance of existing dwellings. Efforts to gain these energy savings are led at national level by policy instruments such as the Energy Performance Certificate, covenants, economic and information tools. These instruments reflect a policy style described as consensus based and incentivising. However, this approach has been subject to criticism with suggestions that alternatives are required. As a first step towards conceptualising alternatives previous evaluations and stakeholder interviews are used to assess instruments. Elements from the theory based evaluation method combined with concepts from policy instrument and energy policy literature form an evaluation framework. Results demonstrate weak impact of some key instruments. Underlying theories associated with instruments are often lost during implementation or remain unsubstantiated. Policy instrument and energy policy concepts are evident but are far from pervasive. Results show that current instruments are poorly equipped to forge a long-term energy saving strategy for existing dwellings. It is further demonstrated that complexity with existing dwellings is not only limited to frequently cited barriers but to the intricacies of designing and operating a well-orchestrated instrument mix.
机译:荷兰的气候变化政策认识到现有住房的重要性。在国家一级,通过能源绩效证书,盟约,经济和信息工具等政策工具来努力实现这些节能效果。这些工具反映了一种被描述为基于共识和激励的政策风格。但是,这种方法受到批评,并提出了需要替代方案的建议。作为概念化替代方案的第一步,以前的评估和利益相关者访谈被用来评估工具。基于理论的评估方法的要素与政策工具和能源政策文献的概念相结合,形成了评估框架。结果表明,某些关键工具的影响微弱。与工具相关的基础理论在实施过程中经常会丢失或无法证实。政策手段和能源政策的概念是显而易见的,但远未普及。结果表明,当前的仪器设备不足,无法为现有住宅制定长期的节能策略。进一步证明,现有住房的复杂性不仅限于经常提到的障碍,而且还包括设计和操作精心设计的乐器组合的复杂性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy Policy》 |2012年第6期|p.459-468|共10页
  • 作者单位

    OTB Research Institute for the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, P.O. Box 5030, 2600 CA Delft, The Netherlands;

    OTB Research Institute for the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, P.O. Box 5030, 2600 CA Delft, The Netherlands;

    OTB Research Institute for the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, P.O. Box 5030, 2600 CA Delft, The Netherlands;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    existing private dwellings; policy instruments; evaluation;

    机译:现有的私人住宅;政策手段;评价;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号