...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >Internet-based public debate of CCS: Lessons from online focus groups in Poland and Spain
【24h】

Internet-based public debate of CCS: Lessons from online focus groups in Poland and Spain

机译:CCS的基于互联网的公开辩论:来自波兰和西班牙的在线焦点小组的经验教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper makes three contributions to the developing literature on public opinion and understanding of CCS. The first is a discussion of online focus groups as a deliberative method in experimental and perhaps consultative contexts. The second is the role of anchoring and associative reasoning in the development of public opinion of CCS, illustrated through the coincidental timing of the investigation with the Fukushima nuclear accident. The third is a discussion of managing public-facing energy messaging in an age of public access to online information. Two multi-day, online focus groups or "dialogue boards" were held, one in Poland and one in Spain, with participants drawn from regions with active CCS development potential. The nature of the groups led to participants being subject to wider social influence through discussion of the topic off-line. They were also able to research and present evidence on the topic to the group, deepening debate and allowing the emergence of 'experts'. The study illustrates and affirms the importance of trust in message source, the difficulties of challenging pre-existing concerns and opinion and the challenge potentially posed by access to conflicting online information.
机译:本文为发展中的关于公众舆论和对CCS理解的文献做出了三点贡献。首先是关于在线焦点小组的讨论,这些小组是在实验性或咨询性背景下的一种审议方法。第二点是锚定和联想推理在CCS舆论发展中的作用,这是通过与福岛核事故一起进行调查的巧合时机来说明的。第三部分是关于在公众访问在线信息时代管理面向公众的能源消息传递的讨论。举行了两个多天的在线焦点小组或“对话委员会”,一个在波兰,一个在西班牙,参与者来自具有活跃CCS开发潜力的地区。小组的性质导致参与者通过脱机讨论话题而受到更广泛的社会影响。他们还能够对该小组进行研究并提供有关该主题的证据,从而加深了辩论并允许“专家”的出现。该研究表明并肯定了对消息源的信任的重要性,挑战先前存在的关注和观点的困难以及访问冲突的在线信息可能带来的挑战。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy Policy》 |2013年第5期|693-702|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Sociology and Communications, Brunei University, Kingston Lane, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK;

    Centra de Investigation Sociotecnica (CIEMAT), Gran Via de les Cons Catalanes, 604, 08007 Barcelona, Spain;

    Institute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Poland;

    Centre for Integrated Energy Research and Sustainability Research Institute, Energy Building, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK;

    Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands (ECN), Radarweg 60, 1040 AW Amsterdam, The Netherlands;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    carbon capture and storage (ccs); perception; risk;

    机译:碳捕集与封存(ccs);感知;风险;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号