首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >Getting to India's electric vehicle targets cost-effectively: To subsidize or not, and how?
【24h】

Getting to India's electric vehicle targets cost-effectively: To subsidize or not, and how?

机译:获得印度的电动汽车的成本有效:补贴或不补贴,以及如何?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the context of India's ambitious electric vehicle targets, we examine two related questions. First, based on lifetime costs, which electric vehicles need to be subsidized? Second, based on lifetime subsidies, which subsidy option would be the most cost-effective? We find that electric two-wheelers, three-wheelers, four-wheeler-taxis, and buses do not need to be subsidized given that they are already cost competitive with comparable vehicles using internal combustion engines. We also find that personal cars and long-haul trucks need to be subsidized significantly, by one-third to one-half of the upfront costs. Finally, we find that an upfront subsidy is the most cost-effective subsidy option, followed by a per kilometer subsidy, which is effectively 19-31% costlier, whereas financing subsidies are found to be the least cost effective. Our results suggest that a cost-effective policy in India would be to subsidize only personal cars and long-haul trucks, while using the upfront subsidies.
机译:在印度雄心勃勃的电动汽车目标的背景下,我们研究了两个相关的问题。首先,基于寿命成本,需要补贴哪种电动汽车?其次,基于寿命补贴,哪些补贴选项将是最具成本效益的?我们发现电动两轮车,三轮车,四轮车 - 出租车和公共汽车不需要补贴,因为它们已经具有与使用内燃机的可比较车辆具有成本竞争力。我们还发现,个人汽车和长途卡车需要大幅度补贴,三分之一到前期成本的一半。最后,我们发现前期补贴是最具成本效益的补贴选项,其次是每公里补贴,其有效地是19-31%的昂贵级,而融资补贴被认为是最便同的成本效益。我们的研究结果表明,印度的经济效益政策将是仅使用前期补贴的个人汽车和长途卡车补贴。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号