首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >Embodied energy use of China's megacities: A comparative study of Beijing and Shanghai
【24h】

Embodied energy use of China's megacities: A comparative study of Beijing and Shanghai

机译:体现了中国巨石的能源利用:北京和上海的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Previous studies presenting city energy-use profiles generally disregard indirect energy use across global supply chains. Moreover, the distinct energy-use patterns of China's megacities remain unclear due to various urban functions and development strategies associated with urbanization. Therefore, a multi-scale single-region inputoutput model is devised to depict energy-use patterns in two representative Chinese megacities-Beijing and Shanghai. This model highlights the distinct upstream sources of city energy use, elucidating regionalinternational connections. The distinct evolutionary features of the two cities' energy-use structures are presented from a consumption-based perspective. The results show that the growth of Beijing and Shanghai depend heavily on embodied energy resources from other domestic or foreign regions. Further, as Beijing is the country's political center, a considerable amount of its energy use is attributed to government activities. In contrast, 6.05% of the energy consumption in Shanghai, China's financial center, depends on foreign energy sources, whereas the corresponding value in Beijing is only 4.2%. In terms of time-series evolutionary features, the growth rate of Beijing's energy use is notably lower than that of Shanghai due to different development modes during 2002-2012. Comparing these two typical cities' energy-use profiles highlights the urgent need for globallyoriented inclusive governance, and energy conservation policies based on distinct city functions and development plans.
机译:以前的研究提出了城市能源使用型材,通常无视全球供应链的间接能源。此外,由于与城市化有关的各种城市功能和发展战略,中国巨大的巨型能源使用模式仍不明确。因此,设计了一种多尺度单区域输入输出模型,以描述两个代表性的中国大城市 - 北京和上海的能量模式。该模型突出了城市能源使用的独特上游来源,阐明了区域性联系。两个城市能源使用结构的独特进化特征是从基于消费的视角提出的。结果表明,北京和上海的增长严重依赖于其他国内外地区的体现能源。此外,随着北京是该国的政治中心,其能源使用量的大量能源使用归因于政府活动。相比之下,中国金融中心上海的6.05%的能源消耗取决于外国能源,而北京的相应价值仅为4.2%。在时间序列进化特征方面,由于2002 - 2012年的不同发展模式,北京能源使用的增长率明显低于上海的增长率。比较这两个典型的城市的能源用途概况突出了基于不同城市职能和发展计划的全球性包容性治理的迫切需要。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy Policy》 |2021年第8期|112243.1-112243.14|共14页
  • 作者单位

    Renmin Univ China Sch Publ Adm & Policy Beijing 100872 Peoples R China;

    Peking Univ Coll Engn Lab Syst Ecol & Sustainabil Sci Beijing 100871 Peoples R China;

    Renmin Univ China Sch Publ Adm & Policy Beijing 100872 Peoples R China;

    Univ Cambridge Dept Land Econ Cambridge CB3 9EP England|Renmin Univ China Sch Business Beijing 100872 Peoples R China;

    UCL Bartlett Sch Sustainable Construct London WC1E 7HB England;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    China; Megacities; Embodied energy use; Multi-scale input-output analysis;

    机译:中国;Megacities;体现能耗;多尺度输入输出分析;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号