首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >The need for policies to reduce the costs of cleaner cooking in low income settings: Implications from systematic analysis of costs and benefits
【24h】

The need for policies to reduce the costs of cleaner cooking in low income settings: Implications from systematic analysis of costs and benefits

机译:需要制定政策以降低低收入环境中清洁烹饪的成本:系统分析成本和收益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Inefficient household cooking in less-developed countries harms health and productivity, the environment, and the global climate. Interventions to encourage adoption of cleaner and more fuel-efficient stoves are being implemented widely to reduce these burdens, but sustained use has proven elusive. This study develops a data-driven simulation approach to investigate the potential costs and benefits of cleaner stoves, informed by recent empirical studies. The results suggest that the private case for adoption of technologies other than charcoal ICS is often unclear; that is, households' private benefits do not usually outweigh the costs of these improvements. Overall social benefits, in contrast, are typically positive and large for nearly all such improved technologies. We investigate how economic benefits vary with intensity of use, and find that higher use does not unambiguously translate into greater private benefits. Analyzing the effects of different subsidies, we further find that fuel subsidies for purchased fuels could substantially improve private net benefits, but that even these may be insufficient to make cleaner cooking attractive to many households; stove subsidies meanwhile tend to modestly improve private outcomes. To capture the social benefits of cleaner cooking, new and effective incentives may be needed to support household use of efficient stoves.
机译:在欠发达国家中,低效的家庭烹饪会危害健康和生产力,环境以及全球气候。鼓励采用更清洁,更省油的炉灶的干预措施正在广泛实施,以减轻这些负担,但是持续使用已被证明是可望而不可及的。这项研究开发了一种数据驱动的模拟方法,以最近的实证研究为基础,研究清洁炉具的潜在成本和收益。结果表明,采用除木炭ICS以外的其他技术的私人案例通常不清楚。也就是说,家庭的私人利益通常不会超过这些改善的成本。相比之下,几乎所有此类改进技术的总体社会收益通常都是积极的,而且是巨大的。我们调查了经济利益如何随使用强度的变化而变化,发现更高的使用并不会明确地转化为更大的私人利益。通过分析不同补贴的影响,我们进一步发现购买燃料的燃料补贴可以大大改善私人净收益,但是即使是这些补贴也不足以使清洁的烹饪吸引许多家庭。灶具补贴同时倾向于适度改善私人收益。为了获得更清洁烹饪的社会效益,可能需要新的有效激励措施来支持家庭使用高效炉灶。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号