...
首页> 外文期刊>The Energy Journal >Price Asymmetry In Energy Demand Models: A Proxy for Energy-Saving Technical Change?
【24h】

Price Asymmetry In Energy Demand Models: A Proxy for Energy-Saving Technical Change?

机译:能源需求模型中的价格不对称:是节能技术变革的代名词?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

It has become fashionable to believe that energy and oil demand respond asymmetrically to price increases and decreases. Unfortunately, the asymmetric price model utilized by Gately and others has the unintended by-product of producing intercept shifts in the demand function purely in response to price volatility. Thus what is in fact energy saving technical change is attributed to price asymmetry. The two become observationally equivalent. Furthermore, the asymmetric price model has the peculiarity of being dependent on the starting point of the data period so that parameter estimates are not robust across different sample periods. We demonstrate empirically using a panel of OECD countries for oil and energy demand that symmetric price responses cannot be rejected after explicitly controlling for energy saving technical change within a fixed effects model.
机译:相信能源和石油需求对价格的上升和下降不对称地反应已经成为一种时尚。不幸的是,盖特利(Gately)和其他人使用的非对称价格模型具有意外的副产品,即纯粹响应价格波动而在需求函数中产生截距变化。因此,实际上节能技术的变化归因于价格不对称。两者在观察上等效。此外,非对称价格模型具有依赖于数据周期起始点的特殊性,因此参数估计在不同采样周期内均不可靠。我们使用经合组织成员国的石油和能源需求经验证明,在固定效应模型中明确控制节能技术变化之后,对称价格响应不能被拒绝。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号