...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy & Environment >Political science Drawbacks of apriorism in intergovernmental climatology
【24h】

Political science Drawbacks of apriorism in intergovernmental climatology

机译:政治科学政府间气候学中先验主义的弊端

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

IPCC (2013) replaces climate models' over-predictions of near-term global warming with its "expert assessment" that warming in the next 30 years may scarcely exceed that of the last 30. Medium-term anthropogenic forcings and global temperature projections have been all but halved since 1990. There has been no global warming this millennium. Nevertheless, at the intergovernmental level, an aprioristic approach to modeling, over-confidence in models' predictive skill, and serial misrepresentation of results has prevented agreement on what fraction of recent warming was anthropogenic, how much wanning we may cause and at what risk or net welfare loss, if any. The cost of mitigating predicted warming exceeds that of later adaptation by 1-2 orders of magnitude. Given governments' pre-existing monopsony of climatology, the question arises whether intergovernmental science is either necessary or desirable.
机译:IPCC(2013)用其“专家评估”取代了气候模型对近期全球变暖的过高预测,即未来30年的变暖几乎不会超过过去30年的变暖。中期人为强迫和全球温度预测已经自1990年以来,几乎减少了一半。这个千年来,全球没有变暖。然而,在政府间层面上,过分的建模方法,对模型的预测技巧过于自信以及对结果的连续错误陈述,使得人们无法就近期变暖的人为原因,我们可能造成的变暖程度以及所面临的风险或风险达成共识。净福利损失(如果有)。减轻预估变暖的成本比以后的适应措施高1-2个数量级。考虑到政府先前存在的气候学专论,就出现了一个问题,即政府间科学是必要的还是可取的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号