首页> 外文期刊>Energy economics >Electric sector policy, technological change, and U.S. emissions reductions goals: Results from the EMF 32 model intercomparison project
【24h】

Electric sector policy, technological change, and U.S. emissions reductions goals: Results from the EMF 32 model intercomparison project

机译:电力部门政策,技术变革和美国减排目标:EMF 32模型比对项目的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The Energy Modeling Forum (EMF) 32 study compares a range of coordinated scenarios to explore implications of U.S. climate policy options and technological change on the electric power sector. Harmonized policy scenarios (including mass-based emissions limits and various power-sector-only carbon tax trajectories) across 16 models provide comparative assessments of potential impacts on electric sector investment and generation outcomes, emissions reductions, and economic implications. This paper compares results across these policy alternatives, including a variety of technological and natural gas price assumptions, and summarizes robust findings and areas of disagreement across participating models. Under a wide range of policy, technology, and market assumptions, model results suggest that future coal generation will decline relative to current levels while generation from natural gas, wind, and solar will increase, though the pace and extent of these changes vary by policy scenario, technological assumptions, region, and model. Climate policies can amplify trends already under way and make them less susceptible to future market changes. The model results provide useful insights to a range of stakeholders, but future research focused on intersectoral linkages in emission reductions (e.g., the role of electrification), effects of energy storage, and better coverage of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) can improve insights even further. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:能源建模论坛(EMF)32的研究比较了一系列协调的情景,以探索美国气候政策选择和技术变革对电力行业的影响。跨越16种模型的统一政策方案(包括基于质量的排放限值和各种仅针对电力部门的碳税轨迹),提供了对电力部门投资和发电成果的潜在影响,减排和经济影响的比较评估。本文对这些政策选择的结果进行了比较,包括各种技术和天然气价格假设,并总结了参与模型之间的可靠发现和分歧领域。在广泛的政策,技术和市场假设下,模型结果表明,未来的煤炭发电量将相对于当前水平下降,而天然气,风能和太阳能的发电量将增加,尽管这些变化的速度和程度因政策而异方案,技术假设,区域和模型。气候政策可以扩大已经在发生的趋势,并使其不易受到未来市场变化的影响。该模型的结果为一系列利益相关者提供了有用的见解,但是未来的研究集中在部门间在减排方面的联系(例如,电气化的作用),能量存储的效果以及通过碳捕获和存储(BECCS)更好地覆盖生物能源,可以进一步提高洞察力。 (C)2018 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号