首页> 外文期刊>Energy economics >Second-best taxation for a polluting monopoly with abatement investment
【24h】

Second-best taxation for a polluting monopoly with abatement investment

机译:具有减排投资的污染性垄断的第二好的税收

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper characterizes the optimal tax rule to regulate a polluting monopoly when the firm has the possibility of investing in an abatement technology and the environmental damages are caused by a stock pollutant. The optimal policy is given by the stagewise feedback Stackelberg equilibrium of a dynamic policy game between a regulator and a monopolist. The regulator playing as the leader chooses an emission tax to maximize net social welfare, and the monopolist acting as the follower selects the output and the investment in abatement technology to maximize profits. We find that the optimal tax has two components. The first component is negative and equal to the gap between the marginal revenue and the price caused by the firm market power; the second component is given by the difference between the social and private shadow prices of the pollution stock. Considering a linear-quadratic model we show that if marginal environmental damages are constant, the difference between social and private shadow prices is positive and the optimal policy consists of taxing emissions at a constant rate if the marginal damages are large enough. However, if the marginal environmental damages are increasing the numerical exercises carried out show that this difference is negative at the steady state and the optimal policy gives the firm a subsidy when approaching the steady state regardless of the importance of the environmental damages. This result is explained by the negative effect that abatement technology accumulation has on the tax. Finally, it can be pointed out that although both models yield different predictions about the sign of the optimal policy the dynamics is globally stable for both cases. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:本文描述了当企业有可能投资于减排技术并且环境污染是由污染物造成的时,最优税收规则来规范污染性垄断。最优政策是由监管者和垄断者之间的动态政策博弈的阶段反馈Stackelberg均衡给出的。扮演领导者的监管者选择排放税以最大化社会福利,而跟随者的垄断者则选择减排技术的产出和投资以最大化利润。我们发现最优税有两个组成部分。第一个分量为负,等于边际收入与由牢固的市场支配力引起的价格之间的差距;第二部分由污染存量的社会影子价格和私人影子价格之差给出。考虑线性二次模型,我们表明,如果边际环境损害是恒定的,则社会和私人影子价格之间的差异为正,如果边际损害足够大,则最优政策包括对排放量征收恒定税率。但是,如果边际环境损害在增加,则进行的数值实验表明,在稳态时该差异为负,并且最佳策略为企业在达到稳态时提供了补贴,而不管环境损害的重要性如何。减排技术积累对税收产生的负面影响解释了这一结果。最后,可以指出的是,尽管两种模型都对最优政策的迹象做出了不同的预测,但是对于两种情况,动力学都是全局稳定的。 (C)2018 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号