...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy economics >Modelling the relationship between energy intensity and GDP for European countries: An historical perspective (1800-2000)
【24h】

Modelling the relationship between energy intensity and GDP for European countries: An historical perspective (1800-2000)

机译:建立欧洲国家能源强度与GDP之间关系的模型:历史观点(1800-2000)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In this paper we discuss an original article by Gales et al. (2007) concerning the relationship between total energy intensity and GDP per capita. In their chiefly descriptive analysis of four European countries (Sweden, the Netherlands, Italy and Spain) over the last two centuries, no inverted U-curve relationship was found between total energy intensity (sum of traditional and modern energy sources) and GDP per capita. By contrast, in addition to considering total energy intensity we also distinguish between modern energy intensity and traditional energy intensity. Further, we integrate qualitative analysis with empirical analysis (i.e., the ARDL cointegration procedure) in order to make our results more robust. The main conclusions of Gales et al. (2007) are only partially confirmed: considering total energy intensity can lead to erroneous conclusions. In particular, our estimates show a U-shaped relationship between total energy intensity and GDP per capita. In addition, when we decompose total energy intensity, two different relationships emerge: a hyperbolic pattern (traditional energy carriers) and a U-shaped inverse pattern (modern energy carriers). We conclude that the decreasing branch of the U-shaped relationship between total energy intensity and GDP per capita is driven by traditional energy sources when the latter dominate modern energy sources (low levels of GDP per capita). In contrast, the ascending branch of the U-shaped relationship is driven by modern energy sources when prevailing over traditional sources (high levels of GDP per capita). (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:在本文中,我们讨论了Gales等人的原创文章。 (2007年),涉及总能源强度与人均GDP之间的关系。在过去两个世纪中对四个欧洲国家(瑞典,荷兰,意大利和西班牙)的主要描述性分析中,未发现总能源强度(传统和现代能源之和)与人均GDP之间存在倒U曲线关系。 。相比之下,除了考虑总能量强度外,我们还区分了现代能量强度和传统能量强度。此外,我们将定性分析与经验分析(即ARDL协整过程)相结合,以使我们的结果更可靠。 Gales等人的主要结论。 (2007年)只是部分证实:考虑总能量强度会导致错误的结论。特别是,我们的估算表明,总能源强度与人均GDP之间呈U形关系。另外,当我们分解总能量强度时,会出现两种不同的关系:双曲线模式(传统的能量载体)和U形逆模式(现代的能量载体)。我们得出的结论是,当传统能源主导现代能源(人均GDP水平较低)时,总能源强度与人均GDP之间的U型关系的递减分支是由传统能源驱动的。相比之下,U型关系的上升分支是由现代能源驱动的,它胜过传统能源(人均GDP高水平)。 (C)2018 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号