...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy economics >One price doesn't fit all: An examination of heterogeneity in price elasticity of residential electricity in India
【24h】

One price doesn't fit all: An examination of heterogeneity in price elasticity of residential electricity in India

机译:一个价格不能全部满足:印度住宅用电价格弹性的异质性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Although well-designed consumer electricity pricing can improve access, contribute to higher metering, increase penetration of energy efficient technologies, limit extent of the rebound effect, and influence viability of electricity distribution utilities in India, there has been no comprehensive, policy-relevant assessment of price elasticities of electricity demand in the country. The objective of this study is to estimate price elasticity of residential electricity consumption and disaggregate it by state, rural and urban residence, and income categories to provide evidence for electricity tariff setting in India. We combine survey data from five rounds of nationally-representative household consumption expenditure surveys covering the period 2005-2012 with administrative data on electricity deficit and improve on methods applied in previous studies by estimating price elasticities using a quadratic form to account for constraints in electricity supply. We find that while the average price elasticity at the national level is -0.39 (95% confidence interval: -0.46, -0.31), it varies significantly by state, rural and urban residence, and income categories. Our results indicate that a "one 'price' fits all" policy may not be an effective approach to electricity tariff setting in India and a data-driven understanding of heterogeneities in price elasticities can better inform residential electricity tariff design in the country. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:尽管设计合理的消费电价可以改善准入条件,促进更高的计量水平,提高节能技术的普及率,限制反弹效应的程度并影响印度配电公司的生存能力,但尚未进行全面的,与政策相关的评估该国电力需求的价格弹性。这项研究的目的是估计居民用电的价格弹性,并按州,农村和城市居民以及收入类别将其分类,以为印度制定电价提供依据。我们将涵盖2005-2012年的五轮全国代表性家庭消费支出调查的调查数据与电力赤字的行政数据相结合,并通过使用二次形式估算价格弹性来解释电力供应的限制,从而改进先前研究中采用的方法。我们发现,尽管全国平均价格弹性为-0.39(95%置信区间:-0.46,-0.31),但各州,农村和城市居民以及收入类别的差异很大。我们的结果表明,“单一的'价格'适合所有人”政策可能不是印度电价制定的有效方法,并且数据驱动的对价格弹性异质性的理解可以更好地为印度的居民电价设计提供依据。 (C)2019 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号