首页> 外文期刊>Energy and Buildings >Thermo-economic analysis of building energy retrofits using VIP - Vacuum Insulation Panels
【24h】

Thermo-economic analysis of building energy retrofits using VIP - Vacuum Insulation Panels

机译:使用VIP的建筑节能改造的热经济分析-真空隔热板

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Vacuum Insulations Panels (VIPs) are one of the most common Super Insulating Materials (SIMs) on the market today. Although their performances are very high, one of the main drawbacks that limits their widespread application is the high initial cost, which is, on the average, 5 times higher than traditional building insulating materials.The usual approach used to assess the economic feasibility of the energy retrofitting of buildings by means of VIPs takes into consideration the initial cost and the savings due to the reduction in the energy demand. However, it usually results in (unacceptable) long Pay-Back times.In this paper, an energy and economic analysis has been carried out considering the case of the internal insulation wall retrofitting of a typical office building. The Discounted Pay-Back Period (DPBP) has been calculated in order to compare VIPs with expanded polystyrene (EPS). The main advantage of the application of VIPs is an internal space saving as a result of the thinner insulation, but this benefit is frequently not considered in an adequate way. For this reason, the monthly rent has been accounted for in the present study, together with various other variables (climatic zone, aspect ratio, insulation thickness, heating system and ageing effects).The results show that VIPs can be a cost-effective alternative to traditional insulating materials, and they comply with the mandatory requirements related to energy efficiency, when the rental cost is approximately higher than 220 - 320 (sic)/m(2) per year (depending on the climatic zone). (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:真空绝缘板(VIP)是当今市场上最常见的超级绝缘材料(SIM)之一。尽管它们的性能非常高,但限制其广泛应用的主要缺点之一是初始成本高,通常平均比传统建筑隔热材料高5倍。通过VIP进行建筑物的能源翻新时要考虑初始成本和由于减少能源需求而节省的费用。但是,这通常会导致(不可接受的)较长的投资回收期。在本文中,考虑到典型办公大楼的内部隔热墙翻新情况,进行了能源和经济分析。为了将VIP与膨胀聚苯乙烯(EPS)进行比较,计算了折现回收期(DPBP)。 VIP的应用的主要优点是由于较薄的绝缘层而节省了内部空间,但是通常没有以充分的方式考虑这种好处。因此,本研究考虑了月租金以及其他各种变量(气候区,长宽比,保温层厚度,加热系统和老化效应),结果表明VIP可以是一种经济高效的替代方案当传统的绝缘材料每年的租赁成本大约高于220-320(sic)/ m(2)时(取决于气候区),它们符合传统的隔热材料的强制性要求。 (C)2019 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号