首页> 外文期刊>Employee relations >HR technologies and HR-staff technostress: an unavoidable or combatable effect?
【24h】

HR technologies and HR-staff technostress: an unavoidable or combatable effect?

机译:人力资源技术和人力资源员工技术:一种不可避免的或可行的效果吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - Drawing on the job demands-resources and IS literatures, the purpose of this paper is to identify organizational factors that mitigate technostress in the HR department; and to evaluate how technostress and techno-insecurity affect technology's impact on job satisfaction.Design/methodology/approach - This research draws on a web-based survey of 169 US and Canadian firms targeting HR executives as key informants. An HR-context-specific, technostress model was tested with structural equation modeling. Exploratory factor analysis evaluated the structural properties of all multi-item scales and supported their usage. Moderated regression analysis further assessed whether the age and scope of technology portfolios affected certain relationships.Findings - As predicted, department work stress was less likely to increase when there was HR technology (HRT) governance involvement and top management support for this class of technologies. Heightened techno-insecurity had the opposite effect, another anticipated outcome. HR's IT-knowledge actually increased technostress, a counterintuitive result. In turn, HRTs were less likely to improve job satisfaction when technostress and techno-insecurity were high. Top management HRT support and an HR innovation climate better enabled portfolios to enhance satisfaction. Moderating influences were detected as well. As hypothesized, techno-insecurity had a stronger negative effect on job-satisfaction impact for younger portfolios, while innovation climate had a weaker relationship with techno-insecurity where portfolios were limited in scope.Research limitations/implications - External validity would be strengthened by not only increasing sample sizes for the USA and Canada, but also targeting more nations for data collection. In addition, incorporating more user-oriented constructs in the present model (e.g. group potency, collective efficacy) may enhance its explanatory power.Practical implications - These findings underscore the need to consider HR-staff attitudes in technology rollouts. To the extent HR technologies generate technostress, they at a minimum are impediments to department satisfaction, which may have important ramifications for usage and service. The results further establish that initiatives can be taken to offset this problem, both in terms of the ways portfolios are internally supported and how they are managed.Originality/value - This is the first study to formally assess how collective work-attitudes in the HR department are affected by HR technologies. Prior research has focused on user-reactions to HRT features or their wider influence on stakeholder perceptions. It is also the first investigation to empirically test potential technostress inhibitors in HR settings.
机译:目的 - 绘制作业要求 - 资源,是文献,本文的目的是确定减轻人力资源部门的技术因素;为了评估技术支持和技术不安全影响技术对工作满意度的影响.Design/Methodology/Approach - 这项研究涉及对169个美国和加拿大公司的基于网络的调查,将人力资源高管瞄准关键信息人员。用结构方程建模测试了特定于HR-Context的技术的技术的模型。探索性因子分析评估了所有多项尺度的结构特性,并支持其使用。适度的回归分析进一步评估了技术投资组合的年龄和范围是否影响了某些关系。挑战 - 正如预测的那样,当有人力资源技术(HRT)治理参与和对这类技术的最高管理支持时,部门工作压力不太可能增加。另一项预期的结果,技术不安全提高了。人力资源的IT知识实际上增加了技术支持,违反了结果。反过来,当技术和技术不安全高时,HRT可能不太可能改善工作满意度。顶级管理支持HRT支持和人力资源创新气候更好地支持投资组合,以提高满意度。也检测到适度的影响。作为假设,技术不安全对年轻投资组合的工作满意度强烈影响更强,而创新气候与技术不安全的关系较弱,其中投资组合在范围中受到限制。研究限制/影响 - 外部有效性不会加强只有增加美国和加拿大的样本尺寸,还瞄准更多的数据收集国家。此外,在本模型中包含更多的用户导向结构(例如,组效力,集体疗效)可能会提高其解释性权力。正式意义 - 这些发现强调了需要考虑技术推出中的人力资源态度的态度。在人力资源技术生成技术的范围内,他们最小的是对部门满意度的障碍,这可能具有重要的使用和服务的重要影响。结果进一步确定,可以采取措施来抵消这一问题,无论是在内部支持的方式以及它们的管理方式方面都是如何进行管理的。这是第一次正式评估人力资源中集体工作态度的研究部门受人力资源技术的影响。现有研究专注于对HRT特征的用户反应或对利益攸关方感知的影响。它还在HR设置中对经验测试潜在的技术抑制剂进行了第一次调查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号