首页> 外文期刊>Employee relations >Moving in, moving on: liminality practices in project-based work
【24h】

Moving in, moving on: liminality practices in project-based work

机译:继续前进:基于项目的工作中的自由实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate the practices mobile project workers rely upon to deal with their liminal work situation, i.e. a work situation in which they are "in-between" and do not have a clear long-term belonging to any specific organisation or project. Design/methodology/approach - The study employs a qualitative approach and draws upon in-depth interviews with 24 engineers working for one of Scandinavia's leading technical consultancies. The aim of the qualitative data analysis was to identify a set of commonalities and differences in their ^ experiences and ways of dealing with liminality. Findings - The data indicate that mobile project workers experience their liminality in two separate dimensions; one which is primarily technical and task related, and one that is predominantly group related and social. These types of liminality are dealt with either actively, to lower or handle the ambiguity in the situation, or passively when the individual waits for the situation to be dealt with by others. Based on these two dimensions and types, the paper identifies and discusses four kinds of liminality practices. Research limitations/implications - The paper demonstrates the importance of focusing on individuals in project-based work, and specifically how they deal with work in-between. The paper shows when and how individuals make use of different liminality practices in their work, and calls for further research on the different skill sets and competencies that are needed to deal with liminality. Originality/value - By identifying four liminality practices applied in situations signified by the experience of being in-between, this study offers an important contribution to the literature on flexible and mobile work conditions. Thus, the paper contributes to the knowledge of threshold-like employment positions that denotes the everyday work situation for an increasing number of individuals engaged in knowledge-intensive and project-based work.
机译:目的-本文的目的是调查流动项目工作人员处理临时工作状况所依赖的做法,即他们“处于中间”并且没有明确的长期归属于任何人的工作状况具体的组织或项目。设计/方法论/方法-该研究采用定性方法,并与对斯堪的纳维亚领先技术咨询公司之一工作的24名工程师进行了深入访谈。定性数据分析的目的是确定他们的经验和应对法律的方式的一系列共性和差异。调查结果-数据表明,移动项目工作人员在两个独立的维度上经历了自己的限制。一种主要与技术和任务相关,另一种主要与群体相关且与社会相关。这些类型的限制可以主动处理,以降低或处理情境中的歧义,或者在个人等待他人处理情况时被动地处理。基于这两个维度和类型,本文确定并讨论了四种限制行为。研究的局限性/意义-本文证明了在基于项目的工作中关注个人的重要性,尤其是他们如何处理介于两者之间的工作。本文说明了个人何时以及如何在工作中使用不同的刑法实践,并呼吁对处理刑法所需要的不同技能和能力进行进一步研究。独创性/价值-通过确定在介于两者之间的经验所代表的情况下所采用的四种禁忌习俗,本研究为有关灵活和流动工作条件的文献提供了重要的贡献。因此,本文有助于了解阈值式的就业岗位,这代表了越来越多的从事知识密集型和基于项目的工作的个人的日常工作情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号