首页> 外文期刊>Emerging markets review >On time-varying predictability of emerging stock market returns
【24h】

On time-varying predictability of emerging stock market returns

机译:新兴股票市场收益随时间变化的可预测性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The two recent studies of Cajueiro and Tabak (2004b) and Hull and McGroarty (2014) investigate the predictability of emerging stock market returns based on the Hurst coefficient a simple but powerful measure of long-range dependence. Unfortunately, the insights gained in these studies are limited because they (i) present conflicting evidence on the time-varying nature of the estimated Hurst coefficients and (ii) incorrectly equate random walk behaviour with market efficiency. In this note, we revisit the issue of time-varying predictability for a rich sample of 21 emerging markets in the 27-year period from 1988 to 2015. Extending the two aforementioned studies by various alternative fractal estimators of the Hurst coefficient, trend regressions and several robustness checks, our analysis reveals significant downward trends in the local Hurst coefficients of almost all markets. Specifically, we document vanishing predictability over time, which indicates that profitable emerging market investment strategies based on past returns may not continue their good performance in the future. Furthermore, we explicitly point out why a random walk is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for rationally determined security prices, and thus signs of predictability (randomness) should not be interpreted as evidence for market inefficiency (efficiency). (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:Cajueiro和Tabak(2004b)和Hull和McGroarty(2014)最近的两项研究基于Hurst系数研究了新兴股票市场收益的可预测性,Hurst系数是一种简单但有效的长期依赖度量。不幸的是,在这些研究中获得的见解是有限的,因为它们(i)在估计的赫斯特系数的时变性质上提供了相互矛盾的证据,并且(ii)错误地将随机游走行为与市场效率等同起来。在本说明中,我们将回顾1988年至2015年这27年间21个新兴市场的丰富样本随时间变化的可预测性问题。通过对Hurst系数,趋势回归和通过几次稳健性检查,我们的分析揭示了几乎所有市场的本地赫斯特系数都有显着的下降趋势。具体而言,我们记录了随着时间的流逝而逐渐消失的可预测性,这表明基于过去收益的有利可图的新兴市场投资策略将来可能不会继续表现良好。此外,我们明确指出了为什么随机游走既不是合理确定证券价格的必要条件也不是充分条件,因此,可预测性(随机性)的迹象不应被解释为市场效率低下(效率)的证据。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号