首页> 外文期刊>Emerging Markets Finance & Trade >Corruption and Income Inequality in China
【24h】

Corruption and Income Inequality in China

机译:中国的腐败和收入不平等

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We investigate the intricate relation between corruption and income inequality in China based on provincial panel data of 1996-2014. Our analysis shows that lower corruption is associated with higher income inequality. This seemingly counter-intuitive result, however, is consistent with findings from countries with a large informal sector, particularly those in Latin America. Institutional reform reduces corruption but also imposes additional costs on the participants in the informal sector. The latter effect, at least initially, exacerbates inequality, giving rise to the negative correlation. After the informal sector in China is considered, that negative relation vanishes. Moreover, when reform is accompanied by measures protecting the poor (such as those taken in the agricultural reform occurring in early 2000s), its perverse impact on inequality is significantly reduced. Lastly, public investment is positively associated with income inequality as the former, generally financed by taxation, may transfer income from the taxpayers to the business elites.
机译:我们根据1996 - 2014年省级小组数据调查中国腐败与收入不平等的错综复杂关系。我们的分析表明,较低的腐败与更高的收入不平等有关。然而,这种看似反向直观的结果与来自具有大型非正规部门的国家的调查结果一致,特别是拉丁美洲的结果。制度改革减少了腐败,但在非正规部门的参与者上也会施加额外费用。后者效果至少最初加剧不等式,产生负相关性。在考虑了中国的非正规部门之后,负面关系消失了。此外,当改革伴随着保护穷人的措施(例如在2000年代初发生的农业改革中采取的措施),其对不平等的歪斜影响大幅减少。最后,公共投资与前者的收入不平等充分相关,通常由税收资助,可以将纳税人收入转移到商业精英。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号