首页> 外文期刊>IBM Systems Journal >Enterprise information analysis: Cost-benefit analysis and the data-managed system
【24h】

Enterprise information analysis: Cost-benefit analysis and the data-managed system

机译:企业信息分析:成本效益分析和数据管理系统

获取原文
           

摘要

A gradual evolution of systems design has occurred concurrently with the introduction of each new computer generation. The initial systems design was batch-oriented, largely a replacement of clerical functions supporting operational management, which lent itself well to a financial justification using classical cost-benefit analysis and which had virtually no intangible costs or benefits to consider. With the development of the facilities to support on-line systems came the development of “management information systems” and “management inquiry systems,” providing information and data as input to functional management for tactical planning. The intangible benefits of “better management decisions” were generally noted but not assigned a value in the cost-benefit analysis. The development of data-managed management information systems and decision support systems has extended information systems capabilities that provide the potential for integrated support of the strategic planning efforts of the enterprise. These systems cannot be cost-justified on the same basis as the “clerical function replacement” systems. From an accounting perspective, the costs (investments) should be treated differently. The benefits are intangible and, therefore, difficult to assess (1) in dollar terms and (2) in probability of occurrence; however, “hard” dollars will ultimately appear on the Profit and Loss Statement of the enterprise. (Table 1 provides a summary of the differences in the financial aspects of the systems.)
机译:随着新一代计算机的推出,系统设计也逐渐发生了变化。最初的系统设计是面向批处理的,在很大程度上替代了支持运营管理的文书功能,使用经典的成本效益分析可以很好地为财务证明提供依据,并且几乎没有无形的成本或收益需要考虑。随着支持在线系统的设施的发展,出现了“管理信息系统”和“管理查询系统”,它们将信息和数据作为战术规划功能管理的输入。人们普遍注意到“更好的管理决策”的无形收益,但在成本效益分析中并未赋予其价值。数据管理的管理信息系统和决策支持系统的开发扩展了信息系统的功能,这些功能为集成支持企业的战略规划工作提供了潜力。这些系统不能在与“文书功能替换”系统相同的基础上进行成本合理化。从会计角度看,成本(投资)应区别对待。收益是无形的,因此难以评估(1)以美元计算和(2)发生的可能性;但是,“硬”美元最终将出现在企业的损益表中。 (表1汇总了系统财务方面的差异。)

著录项

  • 来源
    《IBM Systems Journal》 |1982年第1期|P.108-123|共16页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号