首页> 外文期刊>Electric Power Components and Systems >A Comparative Study of PI, Fuzzy, and ANN Controllers for Chopper-fed DC Drive with Embedded Systems Approach
【24h】

A Comparative Study of PI, Fuzzy, and ANN Controllers for Chopper-fed DC Drive with Embedded Systems Approach

机译:基于嵌入式系统方法的斩波式直流变频器PI,模糊和ANN控制器的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Attempts are being made to enhance the drive performance by intelligent control using fuzzy logic (FL) and neural network techniques. One of the frequently discussed applications of artificial intelligence in control is the replacement of a standard proportional plus integral (PI) speed controller with an FL or artificial neural network (ANN) speed controller. Regardless of all the work, it appears that a thorough comparison of the drive behavior under PI, FL, and ANN speed control is necessary. This article attempts to compare PI, fuzzy, and ANN controllers that are implemented in an embedded system for closed-loop speed control of DC drive fed by a buck-type DC-DC power converter. The PI controller is designed based on the small signal modeling of the system. The Pi-like fuzzy controller structure is considered for comparison. Two ANN controllers are designed. One controller uses training data obtained from the simulation of a fuzzy controller and the other uses training data from the simulation of a PI controller. The performance of the controllers is studied for a variety of operating conditions, such as step change in speed command and step change in load torque. The parameters selected for the comparison are the steady-state error and the rise time of the response. It is shown that ANN speed controllers provide a superior speed response in terms of rise time and the steady-state error compared to PI and FL controllers. This advantage arises from the fact that the neural network has the property of generalization and the control surface of the neural controller is smooth. The designed neural network controller is simple, with three neurons only, and so it is best suited for embedded system implementation. It is also found that the ANN controller trained with the training data from a PI controller has a better response compared to the ANN controller trained with data from a fuzzy controller.
机译:人们正在尝试通过使用模糊逻辑(FL)和神经网络技术的智能控制来增强驱动器性能。人工智能在控制中的经常讨论的应用之一是用FL或人工神经网络(ANN)速度控制器代替标准比例加积分(PI)速度控制器。无论进行任何工作,似乎都需要对PI,FL和ANN速度控制下的驱动器性能进行全面比较。本文试图比较在嵌入式系统中实现的PI,模糊控制器和ANN控制器,以对由降压型DC-DC电源转换器馈送的DC驱动器进行闭环速度控制。 PI控制器是基于系统的小信号建模而设计的。考虑使用Pi型模糊控制器结构进行比较。设计了两个ANN控制器。一个控制器使用从模糊控制器的仿真获得的训练数据,另一个控制器使用从PI控制器的仿真获得的训练数据。研究了控制器在各种运行条件下的性能,例如速度指令的阶跃变化和负载转矩的阶跃变化。选择用于比较的参数是稳态误差和响应的上升时间。结果表明,与PI和FL控制器相比,ANN速度控制器在上升时间和稳态误差方面提供了出色的速度响应。该优点源自以下事实:神经网络具有泛化特性,并且神经控制器的控制表面光滑。设计的神经网络控制器非常简单,仅具有三个神经元,因此最适合嵌入式系统实现。还发现,与用来自模糊控制器的数据训练的ANN控制器相比,用来自PI控制器的训练数据训练的ANN控制器具有更好的响应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号