首页> 外文期刊>Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice >School-based assessments in high-stakes examinations in Bhutan: a question of trust? Exploring inconsistencies between external exam scores, school-based assessments, detailed teacher ratings, and student self-ratings
【24h】

School-based assessments in high-stakes examinations in Bhutan: a question of trust? Exploring inconsistencies between external exam scores, school-based assessments, detailed teacher ratings, and student self-ratings

机译:不丹高考中的校本评估:信任的问题吗?探索外部考试成绩,基于学校的评估,详细的老师评分和学生自我评分之间的不一致

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study explores the validity of school-based assessments when they serve to supplement scores on central tests in high-stakes examinations. The school-based continuous assessment (CA) marks are compared to the marks scored on the central written Bhutan Certificate of Secondary Education (BCSE) examination, to detailed teacher ratings of student competencies, and to student self-ratings. A survey was undertaken in 10 higher secondary schools, involving 26 English teachers and 365 graduates. Though results indicate moderate conformity among measurements within schools, results between schools indicate that schools with high average scores on the BCSE exam tend to score relatively low CA averages and vice versa. Compared to the CA marks for student performance in English listening and speaking skills, the detailed teacher ratings of students on the same skills correlate more strongly with the BCSE exam marks and the student self-ratings.View full textDownload full textKeywordscentral examinations, school-based assessments, teacher assessments, student self-assessments, listening and speaking skills, BhutanRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2010.530437
机译:本研究探讨了校本评估在补充高风险考试中的中央考试成绩时的有效性。将基于学校的连续评估(CA)分数与在中央书面不丹中等教育证书(BCSE)考试中获得的分数,详细的学生能力老师评分以及学生自我评分进行比较。在10所高中进行了一项调查,涉及26名英语教师和365名毕业生。尽管结果表明各学校之间的度量值具有中等一致性,但各学校之间的结果表明,BCSE考试中平均分数较高的学校倾向于获得较低的CA平均值,反之亦然。与CA成绩相比,学生在英语听力和口语技能方面的表现得到了提高,与BCSE考试成绩和学生的自我评价相比,对具有相同技能的学生进行详细的教师评分与学生的评分之间的相关性更强。查看全文下载全文关键字中心考试,基于学校评估,教师评估,学生自我评估,听力和口语技能,不丹相关变量addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg, google,more“,发布号:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2010.530437

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号